[Intel-gfx] [PATCHv4 3/3] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training for typeC DP support on BXT

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 20:51:20 UTC 2016


Also, how does this integrate with fastboot?

If you unconditionally do the upfront training counting on a modeset
we will never be able to enable fastboot.



On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
<conselvan2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 10:43 +0000, R, Durgadoss wrote:
>> Hi Ander,
>>
>> Thanks for looking at it.
>> Few queries below..
>>
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [mailto:conselvan2 at gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 6:39 PM
>> > To: R, Durgadoss <durgadoss.r at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv4 3/3] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link
>> > training for typeC DP support on BXT
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 19:01 +0530, Durgadoss R wrote:
>> > >
>> > > To support USB type C alternate DP mode, the display driver needs to
>> > > know the number of lanes required by the DP panel as well as number
>> > > of lanes that can be supported by the type-C cable. Sometimes, the
>> > > type-C cable may limit the bandwidth even if Panel can support
>> > > more lanes. To address these scenarios, the display driver will
>> > > start link training with max lanes, and if that fails, the driver
>> > > falls back to x2 lanes; and repeats this procedure for all
>> > > bandwidth/lane configurations.
>> > >
>> > > * Since link training is done before modeset only the port
>> > >   (and not pipe/planes) and its associated PLLs are enabled.
>> > > * On DP hotplug: Directly start link training on the crtc
>> > >   associated with the DP encoder.
>> > > * On Connected boot scenarios: When booted with an LFP and a DP,
>> > >   typically, BIOS brings up DP. In these cases, we disable the
>> > >   crtc and then do upfront link training; and let the subsequent
>> > >   modeset re-enable the crtc.
>> > > * All local changes made for upfront link training are reset
>> > >   to their previous values once it is done; so that the
>> > >   subsequent modeset is not aware of these changes.
>> > >
>> > > Changes since v3:
>> > > * Fixed a return value on BXT check
>> > > * Reworked on top of bxt_ddi_pll_select split from Ander
>> > > * Renamed from ddi_upfront to bxt_upfront since the
>> > >   upfront logic includes BXT specific functions for now.
>> > > Changes since v2:
>> > > * Rebased on top of latest dpll_mgr.c code and
>> > >   latest HPD related clean ups.
>> > > * Corrected return values from upfront (Ander)
>> > > * Corrected atomic locking for upfront in intel_dp.c (Ville)
>> > > Changes since v1:
>> > > *  all pll related functions inside ddi.c
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r at intel.com>
>> > > ---
>> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c |  73 ++++++++++++++++
>> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  | 180
>> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |   5 ++
>> > >  3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> > > index 96234c5..f7fa3db 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> > > @@ -2268,6 +2268,79 @@ intel_ddi_init_hdmi_connector(struct
>> > intel_digital_port
>> > >
>> > > *intel_dig_port)
>> > >   return connector;
>> > >  }
>> > >
>> > > +int intel_bxt_upfront_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> > > +                         struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> > > +{
>> > > + struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
>> > > + struct intel_encoder *encoder = connector->encoder;
>> > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>> > > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
>> > > + struct intel_shared_dpll_config tmp_pll_config;
>> > > + struct bxt_clk_div clk_div = {0};
>> > > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>> > > + enum intel_dpll_id dpll_id = (enum intel_dpll_id)dig_port->port;
>> > > + uint8_t link_bw, lane_count;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (WARN_ON(!crtc))
>> > > +         return -EINVAL;
>> > > +
>> > > + /* Initialize with Max Link rate & lane count supported by panel
>> > > */
>> > > + link_bw =  intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE];
>> > > + lane_count = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd);
>> > What if the panel supports HBR3? We should use the maximum common rate
>> Ok, today that will add one more iteration of Link training before going
>> down to a supported rate.
>>
>> >
>> > between source and sink. And it would be nice if those details where in
>> > intel_dp.c.
>> > Ideally, the platform specific part would take link rate and lane count as
>> > arguments and just do the pll/encoder enabling/disabling.
>> May be with the new {link_bw/lane_count}_upfront variables in intel_dp
>> structure,
>> we could do this easily. Will try this implementation and see how it comes up.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > +
>> > > + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpll_lock);
>> > > + /*
>> > > +  * FIXME: Works only for BXT.
>> > > +  * Select the required PLL. This works for platforms where
>> > > +  * there is no shared DPLL.
>> > > +  */
>> > > + pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[dpll_id];
>> > > + if (WARN_ON(pll->active_mask)) {
>> > > +         DRM_ERROR("Shared DPLL already in use.
>> > active_mask:%x\n",
>> > >
>> > > pll->active_mask);
>> > > +         mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpll_lock);
>> > > +         return -EINVAL;
>> > > + }
>> > > +
>> > > + tmp_pll_config = pll->config;
>> > > +
>> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Using pipe %c with pll %s\n",
>> > > +                 pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->name);
>> > > + do {
>> > > +         crtc->config->port_clock =
>> > > drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(link_bw);
>> > > +         crtc->config->lane_count = lane_count;
>> > > +
>> > > +         bxt_ddi_dp_pll_dividers(crtc->config->port_clock,
>> > > &clk_div);
>> > > +         if (!bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(crtc->config->port_clock,
>> > > +                                 &clk_div, &pll->config.hw_state))
>> > > {
>> > > +                 DRM_ERROR("Could not setup DPLL\n");
>> > > +                 goto exit_pll;
>> > > +         }
>> > > +
>> > > +         /* Enable PLL followed by port */
>> > > +         pll->funcs.enable(dev_priv, pll);
>> > > +         encoder->pre_enable(encoder);
>> > > +
>> > > +         /* Check if link training passed; if so update DPCD */
>> > > +         if (intel_dp->train_set_valid)
>> > > +                 intel_dp_update_dpcd_params(intel_dp);
>> > > +
>> > > +         /* Disable port followed by PLL for next retry/clean up
>> > > */
>> > > +         encoder->post_disable(encoder);
>> > > +         pll->funcs.disable(dev_priv, pll);
>> > > +
>> > > + } while (!intel_dp->train_set_valid &&
>> > > +         intel_dp_get_link_retry_params(intel_dp, &lane_count,
>> > > &link_bw));
>> > > +
>> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Upfront link train %s: lanes:%d bw:%d\n",
>> > > + intel_dp->train_set_valid ? "Passed" : "Failed", lane_count,
>> > > link_bw);
>> > > +
>> > > +exit_pll:
>> > > + pll->config = tmp_pll_config;
>> > > + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpll_lock);
>> > > +
>> > > + return intel_dp->train_set_valid ? 0 : -1;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > >  void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port)
>> > >  {
>> > >   struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> > >
>> > > index 61ee226..57d7159 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> > > @@ -1595,6 +1595,41 @@ void intel_dp_set_link_params(struct intel_dp
>> > > *intel_dp,
>> > >   intel_dp->lane_count = pipe_config->lane_count;
>> > >  }
>> > >
>> > > +void intel_dp_update_dpcd_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> > > +{
>> > > + intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT] &=
>> > ~DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT_MASK;
>> > >
>> > > + intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT] |=
>> > > +                 intel_dp->lane_count &
>> > DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT_MASK;
>> > >
>> > > +
>> > > + intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE] =
>> > > +                 drm_dp_link_rate_to_bw_code(intel_dp-
>> > > link_rate);
>> > I think I mentioned this before. I don't think we should update the dpcd
>> > fields
>> > directly. Instead, there should be a field for the max rate and lane count
>> > achieved through upfront link training in struct intel_dp and
>> > intel_dp_max_link_bw() and intel_dp_max_lane_count() should take that
>> > into
>> > account.
>> I thought we agreed for having that change as a later implementation.
>> Anyway, it's not a big change; So I will do as part of next revision,
>> probably as a separate patch.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +bool intel_dp_get_link_retry_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> > > +                 uint8_t *lane_count, uint8_t *link_bw)
>> > > +{
>> > > + /*
>> > > +  * As per DP1.3 Spec, retry all link rates for a particular
>> > > +  * lane count value, before reducing number of lanes.
>> > > +  */
>> > > + if (*link_bw == DP_LINK_BW_5_4) {
>> > > +         *link_bw = DP_LINK_BW_2_7;
>> > > + } else if (*link_bw == DP_LINK_BW_2_7) {
>> > > +         *link_bw = DP_LINK_BW_1_62;
>> > > + } else if (*lane_count == 4) {
>> > > +         *lane_count = 2;
>> > > +         *link_bw = intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp);
>> > > + } else if (*lane_count == 2) {
>> > > +         *lane_count = 1;
>> > > +         *link_bw = intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp);
>> > > + } else {
>> > > +         /* Tried all combinations, so exit */
>> > > +         return false;
>> > > + }
>> > > +
>> > > + return true;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > >  static void intel_dp_prepare(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> > >  {
>> > >   struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>> > > @@ -4548,6 +4583,135 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> > >   intel_dp->has_audio = false;
>> > >  }
>> > >
>> > > +static struct intel_crtc_state *intel_dp_upfront_get_crtc_state(
>> > > +                         struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> > > +                         struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
>> > > +{
>> > > + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
>> > > + struct drm_atomic_state *state;
>> > > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>> > > +
>> > > + state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(dev);
>> > > + if (!state)
>> > > +         return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> > > +
>> > > + state->acquire_ctx = ctx;
>> > > +
>> > > + crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>> > > + if (IS_ERR(crtc_state)) {
>> > > +         drm_atomic_state_free(state);
>> > > +         state = NULL;
>> > > + }
>> > All this function does is call intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(). Since the
>> > caller
>> > also have to deal with error handling, I don't see what it adds on top of
>> > that.
>> > The code is actually simpler if merged with the function below.
>> This function needs to be called from two places. One in the commit() below,
>> and the other in the upfront_link_train() itself, when the crtc is not
>> enabled already.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > +
>> > > + return crtc_state;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +static int intel_dp_upfront_commit(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> > > +                         struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
>> > This function could use a better name. Something that suggests the crtc is
>> > being disabled. Maybe disable_crtc_for_upfront() ? It doens't really depends
>> > on
>> Sure, better name makes sense..
>>
>> >
>> > anything DP specific, so maybe it would make sense to move it to
>> > intel_display.c  or intel_atomic.c. Then we could call it
>> > intel_crtc_atomic_disable_locked().
>> > The "locked" part since this assumes the ctx already have crtc->mutex locked
>> > so
>> > that there's no risk of -EDEADLK. Although it can just pass the -EDEADLK
>> > error to
>> > the caller, so just intel_crtc_atomic_disable() ?
>> Still this would need to call the above get_crtc_state(..) function.
>> So, I will re-name and if it all looks Ok, will move it to atomic.c
>> Otherwise, will keep it here..
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > +{
>> > > + int ret;
>> > > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>> > > + enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>> > > +
>> > > + crtc_state = intel_dp_upfront_get_crtc_state(crtc, ctx);
>> > > + if (IS_ERR(crtc_state))
>> > > +         return PTR_ERR(crtc_state);
>> > > +
>> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling crtc %c for upfront link train\n",
>> > > pipe_name(pipe));
>> > > +
>> > > + crtc_state->base.active = false;
>> > > + ret = drm_atomic_commit(crtc_state->base.state);
>> > > + if (ret) {
>> > > +         drm_atomic_state_free(crtc_state->base.state);
>> > > +         crtc_state->base.state = NULL;
>> > The function drm_atomic_state_free() frees the crtc_state, so this is a use
>> > after free.
>> Will fix this..
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > + }
>> > > + return ret;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +static int intel_dp_upfront_link_train(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> > > +{
>> > > + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>> > You could just pass intel_dp directly. The only use of connector is when
>> > connector->state->crtc is inspected. But that should have the same value as
>> > intel_dp->base.base.crtc
>> Ok, will change.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
>> > > dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>> > > + struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
>> > > + struct drm_device *dev = intel_encoder->base.dev;
>> > > + struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config;
>> > > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
>> > > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, *tmp_crtc_config;
>> > > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
>> > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc = NULL;
>> > > + bool crtc_enabled = false;
>> > > + int ret, status = 0;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (!IS_BROXTON(dev))
>> > > +         return 0;
>> > > +
>> > > + drm_modeset_acquire_init(&ctx, 0);
>> > > +retry:
>> > > + ret = drm_modeset_lock(&config->connection_mutex, &ctx);
>> > > + if (ret)
>> > > +         goto exit_fail;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (connector->state->crtc) {
>> > > +         crtc = connector->state->crtc;
>> > > +
>> > > +         ret = drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, &ctx);
>> > > +         if (ret)
>> > > +                 goto exit_fail;
>> > > +
>> > > +         crtc_enabled = true;
>> > > + } else {
>> > > +         crtc = intel_get_unused_crtc(&intel_encoder->base, &ctx);
>> > > +         if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(crtc)) {
>> > > +                 ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(crtc);
>> > > +                 DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No crtc available for upfront link
>> > > train:%d\n", ret);
>> > > +                 goto exit_fail;
>> > > +         }
>> > > +         intel_encoder->base.crtc = crtc;
>> > > + }
>> > IMO, the following would be a bit more readable.
>> >
>> >     if (intel_encoder->base.crtc)
>> >             crtc = intel_encoder->base.crtc;
>> >     else
>> >             crtc = intel_get_unused_crtc(&intel_encoder->base, &ctx);
>> >
>> >     if (IS_ERR(crtc)) {
>> >             ...
>> >     }
>> >
>> >     ret = drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, &ctx);
>> >     if (ret)
>> >             goto exit_fail;
>> >
>> >     crtc_enabled = crtc->config->active;
>> >
>> Ok, makes sense. Will re-order this way.
>>
>> >
>> > >
>> > > +
>> > > + intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
>> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Using pipe %c for upfront link training\n",
>> > > +                                 pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
>> > > +
>> > > + ret = drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->primary->mutex, &ctx);
>> > > + if (ret)
>> > > +         goto exit_fail;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (crtc_enabled) {
>> > > +         ret = intel_dp_upfront_commit(intel_crtc, &ctx);
>> > > +         if (ret)
>> > > +                 goto exit_fail;
>> > > + }
>> > > +
>> > > + crtc_state = intel_dp_upfront_get_crtc_state(intel_crtc, &ctx);
>> > > + if (IS_ERR(crtc_state)) {
>> > > +         ret = PTR_ERR(crtc_state);
>> > > +         goto exit_fail;
>> > > + }
>> > > +
>> > > + /* Save the existing config */
>> > > + tmp_crtc_config = intel_crtc->config;
>> > You need to save this earlier. Otherwise if intel_dp_upfront_commit() is
>> > called, the state will be restored with active == false when it should
>> > actually be true.
>> Ok, will save this earlier. But since we don’t re-enable crtc  here after
>> upfront,
>> (we let it get re-enabled as part of subsequent modeset) the restoring
>> with false does not happen today..
>>
>> >
>> > But that would cause intel_crtc->config to be freed, so you need to
>> > use intel_crtc_duplicate_state().
>> Since we alloc a new state and then only call get_crtc_state(), I thought that
>> automatically boils down to duplicate_state() inside
>> drm_atomic_get_crtc_state().
>> Please correct if my understanding is wrong.
>
> It does, but it is a somewhat messy way of doing it in this case, since you need
> to allocate an extra atomic_state.
>
> In any case, after looking at why we need to fiddle with the crtc_state, my
> conclusion was that it is easier to remove those dependencies than to do this
> save/restore dance. All it would take is to pass link rate and lane count
> directly to intel_dp_set_link_params(). The bulk of intel_ddi_pre_enable() can
> be split to a function that takes link rate, lane count and dpll as arguments,
> and then intel_bxt_upfront_link_train() can call it directly.
>
>
>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > + intel_crtc->config = crtc_state;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
>> > > +         status = intel_bxt_upfront_link_train(intel_dp,
>> > > intel_crtc);
>> > > +         /* Other platforms upfront link train call goes here..*/
>> > > +
>> > > + /* Restore the saved config */
>> > > + intel_crtc->config = tmp_crtc_config;
>> > > + intel_encoder->base.crtc = crtc_enabled ? crtc : NULL;
>> > > + drm_atomic_state_free(crtc_state->base.state);
>> > This doesn't actually re-enables the crtc if if was disabled in
>> > intel_dp_upfront_commit(). This will require another atomic operation.
>> > Maybe that intel_crtc_atomic_disable() should just take a bool specifying if
>> > it
>> > should on of off.
>> We let it get re-enabled as part of mode set that happens subsequently.
>> Please let me know your opinion on this.
>
> There's no guarantee there will be a mode set afterwards, since that's a user
> space decision. One thing to check is if this works across suspend/resume. IIUC,
> it is possible a hotplug event won't be sent to user space if the connector
> status didn't change. In that case, I think this might lead to blank screen.
>
> Ander
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Durga
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > +
>> > > +exit_fail:
>> > > + if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
>> > > +         drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx);
>> > > +         goto retry;
>> > > + }
>> > > + drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
>> > > + drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
>> > > + return status;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > >  static void
>> > >  intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>> > >  {
>> > > @@ -4558,7 +4722,7 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector
>> > > *intel_connector)
>> > >   struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
>> > >   enum drm_connector_status status;
>> > >   enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
>> > > - bool ret;
>> > > + bool ret, do_upfront_link_train;
>> > >   u8 sink_irq_vector;
>> > >
>> > >   power_domain =
>> > intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
>> > >
>> > > @@ -4604,7 +4768,11 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector
>> > > *intel_connector)
>> > >           drm_modeset_lock(&dev-
>> > > mode_config.connection_mutex, NULL);
>> > >           intel_dp_check_link_status(intel_dp);
>> > >           drm_modeset_unlock(&dev-
>> > > mode_config.connection_mutex);
>> > > -         goto out;
>> > > +         /*
>> > > +          * If we are here, we have (re)read DPCD above and hence
>> > > +          * need to do upfront link train again.
>> > > +          */
>> > > +         goto upfront;
>> > We can avoid this by not overwriting intel_dp->dpcd as I mentioned above.
>> >
>> >
>> > Ander
>> >
>> > >
>> > >   }
>> > >
>> > >   /*
>> > > @@ -4634,6 +4802,14 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector
>> > > *intel_connector)
>> > >                   DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CP or sink specific irq
>> > > unhandled\n");
>> > >   }
>> > >
>> > > +upfront:
>> > > + /* Do not do upfront link train, if it is a compliance request */
>> > > + do_upfront_link_train =
>> > > +         intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT &&
>> > > +         intel_dp->compliance_test_type !=
>> > DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
>> > >
>> > > +
>> > > + if (do_upfront_link_train &&
>> > intel_dp_upfront_link_train(connector))
>> > >
>> > > +         status = connector_status_disconnected;
>> > >  out:
>> > >   if (status != connector_status_connected) {
>> > >           intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> > > index 27b5dcd..bf98473 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> > > @@ -1082,6 +1082,8 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder
>> > *encoder,
>> > >
>> > >                    struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>> > >  void intel_ddi_set_vc_payload_alloc(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool state);
>> > >  uint32_t ddi_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>> > > +int intel_bxt_upfront_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> > > +                         struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>> > >
>> > >  /* intel_frontbuffer.c */
>> > >  void intel_fb_obj_invalidate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> > > @@ -1284,6 +1286,9 @@ bool intel_dp_init_connector(struct
>> > intel_digital_port
>> > >
>> > > *intel_dig_port,
>> > >                        struct intel_connector *intel_connector);
>> > >  void intel_dp_set_link_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> > >                         const struct intel_crtc_state
>> > > *pipe_config);
>> > > +void intel_dp_update_dpcd_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>> > > +bool intel_dp_get_link_retry_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> > > +                         uint8_t *lane_count, uint8_t *link_bw);
>> > >  void intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>> > >  void intel_dp_stop_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>> > >  void intel_dp_sink_dpms(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int mode);
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



-- 
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list