[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/22] drm/i915: Remove highly confusing i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin()

Joonas Lahtinen joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com
Thu Jul 28 11:53:03 UTC 2016


On to, 2016-07-28 at 12:36 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 01:38:14PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > 
> > On ke, 2016-07-27 at 12:14 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > 
> > > Since i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin() is an idiom breaking curry function for
> > > i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(), spare us the confustion and remove it.
> > confustion should be combustion or confusion
> > 
> > > 
> > > @@ -3741,7 +3742,8 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(struct
> > > drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > >         struct i915_vma *vma;
> > >         int ret;
> > >  
> > > -       BUG_ON(!view);
> > > +       if (!view)
> > > +               view = &i915_ggtt_view_normal;
> > > 
> > Convert other calling sites to take advantage of this if,
> Patches have already been sent to do so, and will be along later as part
> of the VMA handling outside of execbuf.
> 
> > 
> > and also fix the error handling;
> Hmm, what have I missed?
> 
> > 
> > "i915_is_ggtt(vm) ? &i915_ggtt_view_normal : NULL"
> > is used in i915_gem_object_pin and i915_gem_obj_lookup_or_create_vma
> They are queued for removal.
> 

Those two calling sites will rely on the BUG_ON(!view) and pass NULL to
trigger it. So the BUG on should be upper level temporarily to help
bisecting in future.

Regards, Joonas

-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list