[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/22] drm/i915: Start passing around i915_vma from execbuffer
Joonas Lahtinen
joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 29 08:23:43 UTC 2016
On ke, 2016-07-27 at 12:14 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> + if (i915_vma_misplaced(vma, size, alignment, flags)) {
> + if (flags & PIN_NONBLOCK &&
> + (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma) || i915_vma_is_active(vma)))
> + return -ENOSPC;
Why ENOSPC when active? Would not EAGAIN be more appropriate?
> void
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 9ea99e181997..a0759fe613f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -45,11 +45,10 @@
> struct i915_execbuffer_params {
> struct drm_device *dev;
> struct drm_file *file;
> - u32 dispatch_flags;
> - u32 args_batch_start_offset;
> - u32 batch_obj_vm_offset;
> + struct i915_vma *batch;
> + u32 dispatch_flags;
> + u32 args_batch_start_offset;
Remove the superfluous indent altogether.
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> - struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj;
> struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> };
> @@ -102,6 +101,26 @@ eb_reset(struct eb_vmas *eb)
> memset(eb->buckets, 0, (eb->and+1)*sizeof(struct hlist_head));
> }
>
> +static struct i915_vma *
> +eb_get_batch(struct eb_vmas *eb)
> +{
Could have migrated the comment here;
/* The batch is always the LAST item in the VMA list */
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list