[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Program FW_BLC_SELF on 915G as well
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 29 14:57:02 UTC 2016
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
According to Bspec FW_BLC_SELF exists on 915G also. Let's program it.
The only open question is whether there's is a memory self-refresh
enable bit somewhere as well. For 945G/GM it's in FW_BLC_SELF, for
915GM it's in INSTPM. For 915G I can't find one in the docs. Let's drop
a FIXME about this, in case someone with the hardware is ever bored
enough to look for it.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 8cfef7683088..eb1f9ba52180 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -340,6 +340,11 @@ void intel_set_memory_cxsr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
I915_WRITE(FW_BLC_SELF, val);
POSTING_READ(FW_BLC_SELF);
} else if (IS_I915GM(dev)) {
+ /*
+ * FIXME can't find a bit like this for 915G, and
+ * and yet it does have the related watermark in
+ * FW_BLC_SELF. What's going on?
+ */
val = enable ? _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(INSTPM_SELF_EN) :
_MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(INSTPM_SELF_EN);
I915_WRITE(INSTPM, val);
@@ -1621,7 +1626,7 @@ static void i9xx_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *unused_crtc)
if (IS_I945G(dev) || IS_I945GM(dev))
I915_WRITE(FW_BLC_SELF,
FW_BLC_SELF_FIFO_MASK | (srwm & 0xff));
- else if (IS_I915GM(dev))
+ else
I915_WRITE(FW_BLC_SELF, srwm & 0x3f);
}
--
2.7.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list