[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/guc: prefer __set/clear_bit() to bitmap_set/clear()

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 10/06/16 17:50, Dave Gordon wrote:
> Bitmap operators are overkill when touching only one bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> index 7510841..e198599 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static uint16_t assign_doorbell(struct intel_guc *guc, uint32_t priority)
>   	if (id == end)
>   		id = GUC_INVALID_DOORBELL_ID;
>   	else
> -		bitmap_set(guc->doorbell_bitmap, id, 1);
> +		__set_bit(id, guc->doorbell_bitmap);
>
>   	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("assigned %s priority doorbell id 0x%x\n",
>   			hi_pri ? "high" : "normal", id);
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static uint16_t assign_doorbell(struct intel_guc *guc, uint32_t priority)
>
>   static void release_doorbell(struct intel_guc *guc, uint16_t id)
>   {
> -	bitmap_clear(guc->doorbell_bitmap, id, 1);
> +	__clear_bit(id, guc->doorbell_bitmap);
>   }
>
>   /*
>

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko