[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/drv_missed_irq_hang: Fix gem_blt path

[Mika Kuoppala]

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:56:39PM +0300, Marius Vlad wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:26:22PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> > Don't add SOURCE_DIR to the path for gem_blt as if this
>> > script is invocated on some other directory, the path to
>> > gem_blt will be concatenated two times.
>> > 
>> > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88437
>> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  tests/drv_missed_irq_hang | 4 ++--
>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/tests/drv_missed_irq_hang b/tests/drv_missed_irq_hang
>> > index e76c7db674ac..96a653846005 100755
>> > --- a/tests/drv_missed_irq_hang
>> > +++ b/tests/drv_missed_irq_hang
>> > @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
>> >  SOURCE_DIR="$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )"
>> >  . $SOURCE_DIR/drm_lib.sh
>> >  
>> > -oldpath=`pwd`
>> > +oldpath=$PWD
>> >  
>> >  cd $i915_dfs_path
>> >  
>> >  function blt_wait {
>> > -	$oldpath/$SOURCE_DIR/../benchmarks/gem_blt -r 1 -b 64 -t 1 -S > /dev/null
>> > +	${oldpath}/../benchmarks/gem_blt -r 1 -b 64 -t 1 -S > /dev/null
>> But $SOURCE_DIR will always be '.'. If installed, benchmarks/ will be
>> underneath tests/ directory. Is that what you're trying to fix?
>>

My stab at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88437

>> Posted a fix for this when running under piglit:
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/87378/
>

If it fixes the bug above, go for it.

> Neither seem like a general solution for finding the testcase, for all of
> the installed, not-installed, mixed-installed combinations.
>
> Even more tricky is that we want tighter control over the batch to avoid
> a fast GPU never enabling irqs and so never noticing the failed delivery
> (either the operation is completed before the wait, or it will complete
> within the spin).
> -Chris

How about we give up and convert that test C to gain control?

-Mika

>
> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre