[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10b 5/6] drm/i915: Updated request structure tracing

John.C.Harrison at Intel.com John.C.Harrison at Intel.com
Fri Jun 17 11:06:14 UTC 2016


From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>

Added the '_complete' trace event which occurs when a fence/request is
signaled as complete. Also moved the notify event from the IRQ handler
code to inside the notify function itself.

v3: Added the current ring seqno to the notify trace point.

v5: Line wrapping to keep the style checker happy.

v7: Updated to newer nightly (lots of ring -> engine renaming).

v10: Dropped the 'is_empty' flag from trace_i915_gem_request_notify()
as it is now redundant - 'seqno == 0' is equivalent.
[Review comments from Tvrtko Ursulin]

v10b: Re-based due to change in previous patch.

For: VIZ-5190
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c   | 9 +++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c   | 1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 866afef..a876a65 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2969,8 +2969,10 @@ void i915_gem_request_notify(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool fence_locked,
 	 * not-empty. And a false not-empty is not an issue - it would just be
 	 * the same as not doing the early exit test at all.
 	 */
-	if (list_empty(&engine->fence_signal_list))
+	if (list_empty(&engine->fence_signal_list)) {
+		trace_i915_gem_request_notify(engine, 0);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	if (!fence_locked)
 		spin_lock_irq(&engine->fence_lock);
@@ -2978,6 +2980,7 @@ void i915_gem_request_notify(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool fence_locked,
 	if (!lazy_coherency && engine->irq_seqno_barrier)
 		engine->irq_seqno_barrier(engine);
 	seqno = engine->get_seqno(engine);
+	trace_i915_gem_request_notify(engine, seqno);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, req_next, &engine->fence_signal_list, signal_link) {
 		if (!req->cancelled && !i915_seqno_passed(seqno, req->seqno))
@@ -2994,8 +2997,10 @@ void i915_gem_request_notify(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool fence_locked,
 			req->irq_enabled = false;
 		}
 
-		if (!req->cancelled)
+		if (!req->cancelled) {
 			fence_signal_locked(&req->fence);
+			trace_i915_gem_request_complete(req);
+		}
 
 		i915_gem_request_unreference(req);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 8d1a28e..b994266 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -979,7 +979,6 @@ static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	if (!intel_engine_initialized(engine))
 		return;
 
-	trace_i915_gem_request_notify(engine);
 	engine->user_interrupts++;
 
 	queue_work(engine->i915->req_wq, &engine->request_work);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 6768db0..ef4c573 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -546,8 +546,8 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
 );
 
 TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_notify,
-	    TP_PROTO(struct intel_engine_cs *engine),
-	    TP_ARGS(engine),
+	    TP_PROTO(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, uint32_t seqno),
+	    TP_ARGS(engine, seqno),
 
 	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
 			     __field(u32, dev)
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_notify,
 	    TP_fast_assign(
 			   __entry->dev = engine->i915->dev->primary->index;
 			   __entry->ring = engine->id;
-			   __entry->seqno = engine->get_seqno(engine);
+			   __entry->seqno = seqno;
 			   ),
 
 	    TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u",
-- 
1.9.1



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list