[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Remove one unnecessary variable

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Jun 21 15:04:28 UTC 2016


On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 21/06/16 14:00, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >>
> >>No need for local struct drm_device * since dev_priv is the
> >>correct thing to pass in to NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating
> >>anyway. Changed the macro definition for the latter to reflect
> >>that as well.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >>Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            | 7 ++++---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 3 +--
> >>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >>index 48928227bdcc..3775d26ac573 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >>@@ -2788,9 +2788,10 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
> >>  #define HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(dev)		(IS_I830(dev) || IS_845G(dev))
> >>
> >>  /* WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating:skl,bxt */
> >>-#define NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating(dev) (IS_BXT_REVID(dev, 0, BXT_REVID_A1) || \
> >>-						 IS_SKL_GT3(dev) || \
> >>-						 IS_SKL_GT4(dev))
> >>+#define NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating(dev_priv) (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, \
> >>+						     0, BXT_REVID_A1) || \
> >>+						     IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) || \
> >>+						     IS_SKL_GT4(dev_priv))
> >
> >#define NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating(dev_priv) \
> >	(IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1) || \
> >	 IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) ||
> >	 IS_SKL_GT4(dev_priv))
> >
> >Other than that,
> >Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >
> >Just wondering if you fancy having a go at IS_SKL_GT(dev_priv, min, max)...
> 
> What do you have in mind?
> 
> This is a single call site for them BTW. And GCC amazingly does
> manage to merge the two GT tests on its own already. :)

#define GT(x) ((INTEL_DEVID(x) & 0xf0) >> 4)
IS_SKL_GT(dev, min, max) ({
	int gt__ = GT(dev);
	IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && gt__ >= (min) && gt__ < (min);
})

Give or take some more massaging.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list