[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915: Initialize the PPS HW before its first use

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:51:48AM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> The initial DPCD read for eDP detection involves using the PPS, but so
> far we only initialized the PPS registers after the DPCD read. The
> reason this was done so far is to preserve a possible LVDS PPS HW setup
> if LVDS is detected but eDP is not. This is not an issue any more after
> the previous patch, so we can move the init earlier now.
> 
> This was caught by CI with the PPS sanity checks in place and the
> initial eDP DPCD readout waiting for the panel power cycle timeout
> without the PPS registers being initialized.
> 
> CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> CC: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

Seems fine.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 9a1cef4..277b74a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -5333,6 +5333,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  
>  	pps_lock(intel_dp);
>  	intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
> +	intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(dev, intel_dp);
>  	pps_unlock(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/* Cache DPCD and EDID for edp. */
> @@ -5349,11 +5350,6 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* We now know it's not a ghost, init power sequence regs. */
> -	pps_lock(intel_dp);
> -	intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(dev, intel_dp);
> -	pps_unlock(intel_dp);
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>  	edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc);
>  	if (edid) {
> -- 
> 2.5.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC