[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: add sanity check for partial view creation
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Mar 2 13:35:35 UTC 2016
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2016-02-29 at 17:11 +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > When binding pages for a partial view we should check that the offset +
> > size is valid relative to the size of the gem object.
> >
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > index 49e4f26..a477bb2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > @@ -3500,6 +3500,10 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
> > struct sg_page_iter obj_sg_iter;
> > int ret = -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + if (view->params.partial.offset + view->params.partial.size >
> > + obj->pages->nents)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
Wrong. Tell me again what nents has to do with the object size?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list