[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 6/7] tests/gem_scheduler: Add subtests to test batch priority behaviour
Derek Morton
derek.j.morton at intel.com
Wed Mar 2 18:10:44 UTC 2016
Add subtests to test each ring to check batch buffers of a higher
priority will be executed before batch buffers of a lower priority.
v2: Addressed review comments from Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
Signed-off-by: Derek Morton <derek.j.morton at intel.com>
---
tests/gem_scheduler.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_scheduler.c b/tests/gem_scheduler.c
index 762b69f..171b0a3 100644
--- a/tests/gem_scheduler.c
+++ b/tests/gem_scheduler.c
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Check scheduler behaviour. Basic tests ensure independant "
"batch buffers of the same priority are executed in "
- "submission order. Read-read tests ensure "
+ "submission order. Priority tests ensure higher priority "
+ "batch buffers are executed first. Read-read tests ensure "
"batch buffers with a read dependency to the same buffer "
"object do not block each other. Write-write dependency "
"tests ensure batch buffers with a write dependency to a "
@@ -128,11 +129,23 @@ static void init_context(int *fd, drm_intel_bufmgr **bufmgr, int ringid)
intel_batchbuffer_free(noop_bb);
}
-/* Basic test. Check batch buffers of the same priority and with no dependencies
- * are executed in the order they are submitted.
+static void set_priority(int fd, int value)
+{
+ struct local_i915_gem_context_param param;
+ param.context = 0; /* Default context */
+ param.size = 0;
+ param.param = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY;
+ param.value = (uint64_t)value;
+ gem_context_set_param(fd, ¶m);
+}
+
+/* If 'priority' is 0, check batch buffers of the same priority and with
+ * no dependencies are executed in the order they are submitted.
+ * If 'priority' is set !0, check batch buffers of higher priority are
+ * executed before batch buffers of lower priority.
*/
#define NBR_BASIC_FDs (3)
-static void run_test_basic(int in_flight, int ringid)
+static void run_test_basic(int in_flight, int ringid, int priority)
{
int fd[NBR_BASIC_FDs];
int loop;
@@ -152,6 +165,13 @@ static void run_test_basic(int in_flight, int ringid)
for(loop=0; loop < NBR_BASIC_FDs; loop++)
init_context(&(fd[loop]), &(bufmgr[loop]), ringid);
+ /* For high priority set priority of second context to overtake first
+ * For low priority set priority of first context to be overtaxen by second
+ */
+ if(priority > 0)
+ set_priority(fd[2], priority);
+ else if(priority < 0)
+ set_priority(fd[1], priority);
/* Create buffer objects */
delay_bo = create_and_check_bo(bufmgr[0], "delay bo");
@@ -201,9 +221,14 @@ static void run_test_basic(int in_flight, int ringid)
igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(delay_buf[2], ts1_buf[0]),
"Delay ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
delay_buf[2], ts1_buf[0]);
- igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts1_buf[0], ts2_buf[0]),
- "TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS2 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
- ts1_buf[0], ts2_buf[0]);
+ if(priority)
+ igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts2_buf[0], ts1_buf[0]),
+ "TS2 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
+ ts2_buf[0], ts1_buf[0]);
+ else
+ igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts1_buf[0], ts2_buf[0]),
+ "TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS2 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
+ ts1_buf[0], ts2_buf[0]);
/* Cleanup */
for(loop = 0; loop < in_flight; loop++)
@@ -430,7 +455,19 @@ igt_main
for (loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
igt_subtest_f("%s-basic", rings[loop].name) {
gem_require_ring(fd, rings[loop].id);
- run_test_basic(in_flight, rings[loop].id);
+ run_test_basic(in_flight, rings[loop].id, false);
+ }
+
+ for (loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
+ igt_subtest_f("%s-priority-high", rings[loop].name) {
+ gem_require_ring(fd, rings[loop].id);
+ run_test_basic(in_flight, rings[loop].id, 1000);
+ }
+
+ for (loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
+ igt_subtest_f("%s-priority-low", rings[loop].name) {
+ gem_require_ring(fd, rings[loop].id);
+ run_test_basic(in_flight, rings[loop].id, -1000);
}
for (loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
--
1.9.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list