[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Do not wait atomically for display clocks

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Looks like this code does not need to wait atomically since it
otherwise takes the mutex.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 08c363127885..124342bdbe90 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -9857,8 +9857,8 @@ static void broadwell_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
 	val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
 	I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
 
-	if (wait_for_atomic_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
-			       LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
+	if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
+			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
 		DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
 
 	val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
@@ -9892,8 +9892,8 @@ static void broadwell_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
 	val &= ~LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
 	I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
 
-	if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
-				LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE) == 0, 1))
+	if (wait_for_us((I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
+			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE) == 0, 1))
 		DRM_ERROR("Switching back to LCPLL failed\n");
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
-- 
1.9.1