[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't WARN() when sprite watermark > 0 for disabled LP2/LP3 levels
Matt Roper
matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Fri Mar 4 17:37:40 UTC 2016
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:45:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:18:09PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > As of commit d81f04c5ef ("drm/i915: Allow preservation of watermarks, v2.")
> > it's now possible to have non-zero values for watermark levels that are
> > disabled (e.g., in the higher LP levels that can only be used when the sprite
> > is disabled). Stop WARN()'ing when we see these non-zero sprite values in LP2
> > or LP3.
> >
> > Fixes the SNB warning:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 25405 at /home/mattrope/work/kernel/gms/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:2580 ilk_program_watermarks+0x7b2/0x9d0 [i915]()
> > WARN_ON(wm_lp != 1)
> > Modules linked in: i915 drm_kms_helper drm bluetooth fuse iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops tpm_tis mei_me e1000e snd_hda_codec_hdmi pcspkr tpm mei i2c_i801 lpc_ich snd_hda_codec snd_hda_core [last unloaded: drm]
> > CPU: 1 PID: 25405 Comm: kms_universal_p Tainted: G U W 4.5.0-rc6apollolake+ #462
> > Hardware name: /DH67GD, BIOS BLH6710H.86A.0160.2012.1204.1156 12/04/2012
> > 0000000000000000 ffff88009d42b918 ffffffff8143cfab ffff88009d42b960
> > ffffffffa0363580 ffff88009d42b950 ffffffff81082746 ffff8800b9a24928
> > ffff88009d42ba00 ffff88009d4a0000 0000000000000000 ffff88009d42ba6c
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff8143cfab>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x72
> > [<ffffffff81082746>] warn_slowpath_common+0x86/0xc0
> > [<ffffffff810827cc>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
> > [<ffffffffa0292862>] ilk_program_watermarks+0x7b2/0x9d0 [i915]
> > [<ffffffffa0292cb7>] ilk_initial_watermarks+0x107/0x120 [i915]
> > [<ffffffffa02feffa>] intel_pre_plane_update+0x12a/0x190 [i915]
> > [<ffffffffa02ffb36>] intel_atomic_commit+0x546/0xd50 [i915]
> > [<ffffffffa012c9e7>] drm_atomic_commit+0x37/0x60 [drm]
> > [<ffffffffa0217361>] drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane+0xb1/0xf0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [<ffffffffa011cdb4>] __setplane_internal+0x184/0x280 [drm]
> > [<ffffffffa012b57a>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all_ctx+0x9a/0xb0 [drm]
> > [<ffffffffa012010f>] drm_mode_setplane+0x13f/0x1c0 [drm]
> > [<ffffffffa0111b52>] drm_ioctl+0x142/0x590 [drm]
> > [<ffffffffa011ffd0>] ? drm_plane_check_pixel_format+0x50/0x50 [drm]
> > [<ffffffff811f2744>] ? mntput+0x24/0x40
> > [<ffffffff811d28d4>] ? __fput+0x194/0x200
> > [<ffffffffa012dec3>] drm_compat_ioctl+0x33/0x40 [drm]
> > [<ffffffffa029e1c2>] i915_compat_ioctl+0x32/0x40 [i915]
> > [<ffffffff81228d72>] compat_SyS_ioctl+0xc2/0x330
> > [<ffffffff810021d5>] ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0x95/0xb0
> > [<ffffffff81002d2e>] do_fast_syscall_32+0x9e/0x210
> > [<ffffffff8197faf2>] entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x52/0x70
> >
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Testcase: kms_universal_plane
> > Fixes: d81f04c5ef ("drm/i915: Allow preservation of watermarks, v2.")
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > ---
> > The comment above this block of code indicates that we need to turn on
> > WM1S_LP_EN, even if the LP level is disabled, to avoid underruns. It's not
> > clear to me from the bspec why this is, so I'm trusting that the comment
> > is still accurate, even though we wind up with non-zero values more often
> > now than we previously did.
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 ++---
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 823437f..9698360 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -2576,10 +2576,9 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
> > * Always set WM1S_LP_EN when spr_val != 0, even if the
> > * level is disabled. Doing otherwise could cause underruns.
> > */
> > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen <= 6 && r->spr_val) {
> > - WARN_ON(wm_lp != 1);
>
> NAK
>
> There are no LP2+ sprite watermarks on ilk/snb, so if something is
> computing it, then we have clearly a bug somewhere else.
That's the point of this patch...having these values computed is
intentional now, not a bug. The patch from Maarten/Paaulo computes the
values for *all* levels, even the ones we know are invalid, but marks
them as disabled.
Given that change in behavior, it no longer makes sense to warn on
non-zero values since they're expected now (even though they'll never be
used). Maybe instead of removing the WARN() I should just add an
"&& r->enable" to the warn condition?
Matt
>
> > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen <= 6 && r->spr_val)
> > results->wm_lp_spr[wm_lp - 1] = WM1S_LP_EN | r->spr_val;
> > - } else
> > + else
> > results->wm_lp_spr[wm_lp - 1] = r->spr_val;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.1.4
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list