[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: More renaming of rings to engines

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 10/03/16 14:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:21:08PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> @@ -4952,14 +4952,14 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>
>>   	if (!i915.enable_execlists) {
>>   		dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit = i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission;
>> -		dev_priv->gt.init_rings = i915_gem_init_rings;
>> -		dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_cleanup_ring_buffer;
>> -		dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_stop_ring_buffer;
>> +		dev_priv->gt.init_engines = i915_gem_init_engines;
>> +		dev_priv->gt.cleanup_engine = intel_cleanup_engine;
>> +		dev_priv->gt.stop_engine = intel_stop_engine;
>>   	} else {
>>   		dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit = intel_execlists_submission;
>> -		dev_priv->gt.init_rings = intel_logical_rings_init;
>> -		dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_logical_ring_cleanup;
>> -		dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_logical_ring_stop;
>> +		dev_priv->gt.init_engines = intel_logical_rings_init;
>> +		dev_priv->gt.cleanup_engine = intel_logical_ring_cleanup;
>> +		dev_priv->gt.stop_engine = intel_logical_ring_stop;
>
> Making these changes manually or another patch?

Another *s*patch? No, this was manually. I was running out of steam with 
Coccinelle and 5/5 are just a few I've spotted and done by hand (or 
sed). Possibly I've missed some but the main body of churn is all here I 
think.

Regards,

Tvrtko