[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/bxt: Fix off-by-one error in Broxton PLL IDs (rev3)

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> [ text/plain ]
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:37:24PM +0200, Tomi Sarvela wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 16 March 2016 10:48:43 Imre Deak wrote:
>>> > Tomi, noticed two things that maybe infrastructure related, see below:
>>> >
>>> > > Test drv_module_reload_basic:
>>> > >                 skip       -> PASS       (bdw-nuci7)
>>> > > Test gem_ringfill:
>>> > >         Subgroup basic-default-s3:
>>> > >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (skl-nuci5)
>>> > > Test gem_storedw_loop:
>>> > >         Subgroup basic-bsd:
>>> > >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (skl-nuci5)
>>> > >         Subgroup basic-bsd1:
>>> > >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (skl-nuci5)
>>> >
>>> > Unrelated platform. All of the above are SND resume failures. Ville
>>> > said he contacted Takashi about them.
>>>
>>> SND is recurring problem. I'd like to see drm-intel-nightly not breaking when
>>> pulling sound updates.
>>
>> We need to escalate this again, snd team seriously sucks at quality
>> control :( Adding Libin&Takashi. If this doesn't improve I need to throw
>> sound trees out of -nightly for real.
>
> With that, we'd get more stable CI, but we'd also only see the failures
> once the sound trees get merged upstream. We don't want that either.
>
> One idea would be to have separate CI runs for updating trees not in our
> control. But we're pretty far from making that happen.

Yes agreed, it would probably not help a lot at all to drop sound
trees, we'd simply notice a bit later. I'm not sure what would be the
best option here, just expressing maintainer grumpiness ;-) Good ideas
very much welcome ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch