[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Replace get_user_pages()
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Mar 17 10:09:28 UTC 2016
On 17/03/16 09:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Although the long term future of get_user_pages_locked() itself is
> doubtful, the kernel currently recommends:
>
> /* get_user_pages should be phased out in favor of
> * get_user_pages_locked|unlocked or get_user_pages_fast. Nothing
> * should use get_user_pages because it cannot pass
> * FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY to handle_mm_fault.
> */
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> index 54088a4d6498..fa7d8a8b66ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> @@ -500,20 +500,22 @@ __i915_gem_userptr_get_pages_worker(struct work_struct *_work)
> pvec = drm_malloc_ab(npages, sizeof(struct page *));
> if (pvec != NULL) {
> struct mm_struct *mm = obj->userptr.mm->mm;
> + int locked = 1;
>
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> while (pinned < npages) {
> - ret = get_user_pages(work->task, mm,
> - obj->userptr.ptr + pinned * PAGE_SIZE,
> - npages - pinned,
> - !obj->userptr.read_only, 0,
> - pvec + pinned, NULL);
> + ret = get_user_pages_locked(work->task, mm,
> + obj->userptr.ptr + pinned * PAGE_SIZE,
> + npages - pinned,
> + !obj->userptr.read_only, 0,
> + pvec + pinned, &locked);
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
>
> pinned += ret;
> }
> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + if (locked)
> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> }
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Is it just cleanup or actually improves some real (as in hit by someone)
scenario?
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list