[Intel-gfx] [PATCH resend for CI 2/2] drm/i915: Use shorter route to dev_private where possible

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Mar 17 13:17:59 UTC 2016


On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:04:10PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> 
> Where we have a request we can use req->i915 directly instead
> of going through the engine and device. Coccinelle script:
> 
> @@
> function f;
> identifier r;
> @@
> f(..., struct drm_i915_gem_request *r, ...)
> {
> ...
> - engine->dev->dev_private
> + r->i915
> ...
> }
> @@
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
> @@
> (
>   req->
> - engine->dev->dev_private
> + i915
> )

struct intel_engine_cs *e;
- e->dev->dev_private
+ e->i915

Pretty please?

INTEL_INFO(engine->dev) (IS_GEN, HAS_ etc)
if r: INTEL_INFO(r->i915)
if e: INTEL_INFO(e->i915)
?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list