[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/tdr: Initialize hangcheck struct for each engine

Arun Siluvery arun.siluvery at linux.intel.com
Fri Mar 18 21:22:55 UTC 2016


On 18/03/2016 20:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:07:54PM +0000, Arun Siluvery wrote:
>> From: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf at intel.com>
>>
>> Initialize hangcheck struct during driver load. Since we do the same after
>> recovering from a reset, this is extracted into a helper function.
>>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c         | 12 ++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c        |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |  7 ++++++-
>>   4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
>> index 3f439a0..c5d1673 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
>> @@ -945,6 +945,16 @@ static void intel_init_dpio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   	}
>>   }
>>
>> +static void i915_hangcheck_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> +
>> +	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, i)
>> +		intel_engine_init_hangcheck(engine);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int i915_workqueues_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   {
>>   	/*
>> @@ -1233,6 +1243,8 @@ static int i915_driver_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>
>>   	i915_gem_load_init_fences(dev_priv);
>>
>> +	i915_hangcheck_init(dev);
>
> This is tautological. If we are clearing the per-engine hangcheck in
> ring->init_hw() then we will do later anyway. So why now?

It was doing slightly more earlier but now it is not required. The 
helper function intel_engine_init_hangcheck() also doesn't add much 
value so this patch can be ignored.

regards
Arun


> -Chris
>



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list