[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Name the anonymous per-engine context struct (rev2)

[Chris Wilson]

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 09:53:25AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21/03/16 11:22, Patchwork wrote:
> >== Series Details ==
> >
> >Series: drm/i915: Name the anonymous per-engine context struct (rev2)
> >URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4635/
> >State : warning
> >
> >== Summary ==
> >
> >Series 4635v2 drm/i915: Name the anonymous per-engine context struct
> >http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4635/revisions/2/mbox/
> >
> >Test gem_ringfill:
> >         Subgroup basic-default-s3:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
> >Test kms_flip:
> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE
> 
> Sporadic ILK pipe underruns:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93787
> 
> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> >                 fail       -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
> >         Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox)
> 
> Unrelated intermittent device suspended while HW access:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
> 
> >Test kms_force_connector_basic:
> >         Subgroup force-connector-state:
> >                 pass       -> SKIP       (ilk-hp8440p)
> >Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> >         Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-a:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (snb-x220t)
> >         Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (snb-dellxps)
> 
> Same.
> 
> >         Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
> 
> 
> Unrelated lockdep splat: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94350

Is it really the same one? There should be another lockdep chain that
isn't in bugzilla...
 
> >                 incomplete -> PASS       (hsw-gt2)
> >Test pm_rpm:
> >         Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
> >                 fail       -> DMESG-FAIL (snb-x220t)
> 
> Device suspended while HW access again.
> 
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (snb-dellxps)
> >
> >bdw-nuci7        total:194  pass:182  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12
> >bdw-ultra        total:194  pass:173  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21
> >bsw-nuc-2        total:194  pass:156  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37
> >byt-nuc          total:194  pass:159  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35
> >hsw-brixbox      total:194  pass:171  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22
> >hsw-gt2          total:194  pass:176  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:17
> >ilk-hp8440p      total:194  pass:129  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64
> >ivb-t430s        total:194  pass:169  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:25
> >skl-i7k-2        total:194  pass:171  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23
> >snb-dellxps      total:194  pass:159  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:34
> >snb-x220t        total:194  pass:160  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:0   skip:33
> >
> >Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1649/
> >
> >e7a7673e9840fe8b50a5a2894c75565ec7858a00 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-03m-19d-10h-09m-53s UTC integration manifest
> >a1c5f9b1e8b9cbfdab0fb71ccf7a5a0838b56069 drm/i915: Name the anonymous per-engine context struct
> 
> So looking good.
> 
> Chris, r-b on v2? It was just a revert of a hunk which changed one
> instance of ctx->i915->dev->struct_mutex to
> engine->dev->struct_mutex which the CI reminded me is not allowed in
> some places.

That one again! One day we will get engine init/fini sorted. Yes,
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre