[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for kernfs: Move faulting copy_user operations outside of the mutex (rev2)

[Chris Wilson]

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 03:31:24PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On to, 2016-03-24 at 17:03 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 04:34:01PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > 
> > > == Series Details ==
> > > 
> > > Series: kernfs: Move faulting copy_user operations outside of the mutex (rev2)
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3722/
> > > State : warning
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > 
> > > Series 3722v2 kernfs: Move faulting copy_user operations outside of the mutex
> > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3722/revisions/2/mbox/
> > > 
> > > Test pm_rpm:
> > >         Subgroup basic-rte:
> > >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
> 
> This WARN is about Unclaimed access detected, which we have an open bug
> for.
> 
> > >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc) UNSTABLE
> > Something is notable by its absence here!
> 
> Other tests were fine in the run.
> 
> > 
> > Would someone do the honours and see if the suspend tests pass without
> > lockdep WARNs on Brasweel?
> 
> To me it seems it worked just fine. OK if I merge this (and rebase if
> needed)?

I was expecting to see a fair few dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw) since the
purpose of this patch is to cut down on the CI noise. If they are
passing without the patch, this patch is not required, right?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre