[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 1/2] drmtest: don't discard return value in do_ioctl()
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed May 4 15:27:14 UTC 2016
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Robert Bragg wrote:
> In preparation for testing DRM_IOCTL_I915_PERF_OPEN which returns a file
> descriptor this allows us to get the return value of ioctl called by the
> do_ioctl() utility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert at sixbynine.org>
> ---
> lib/drmtest.h | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/drmtest.h b/lib/drmtest.h
> index c391464..6aee1e8 100644
> --- a/lib/drmtest.h
> +++ b/lib/drmtest.h
> @@ -104,11 +104,16 @@ bool is_i915_device(int fd);
> *
> * This macro wraps drmIoctl() and uses igt_assert to check that it has been
> * successfully executed.
> + *
> + * It's implemented using a gcc statement expression to still be able to
> + * assign the ioctl's return value after the assertion too.
> */
> -#define do_ioctl(fd, ioc, ioc_data) do { \
> - igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl((fd), (ioc), (ioc_data)), 0); \
> +#define do_ioctl(fd, ioc, ioc_data) ({ \
> + int _ret = drmIoctl((fd), (ioc), (ioc_data)); \
No. Breaking igt is not acceptable.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list