[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915/guc: distinguish HAS_GUC() from HAS_GUC_UCODE/HAS_GUC_SCHED

[Dave Gordon]

For now, anything with a GuC requires uCode loading, and then supports
command submission once loaded. But these are logically distinct from
simply "having a GuC", so we need a separate macro for the latter. Then,
the test in intel_guc_reset() should depend only on whether the GuC
exists, not whether we're trying to use it for submission.

Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     | 10 ++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index d5496ab..1142cb3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2704,8 +2704,14 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
 
 #define HAS_CSR(dev)	(IS_GEN9(dev))
 
-#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev)	(IS_GEN9(dev) && !IS_KABYLAKE(dev))
-#define HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev)	(IS_GEN9(dev) && !IS_KABYLAKE(dev))
+/*
+ * For now, anything with a GuC requires uCode loading, and then supports
+ * command submission once loaded. But these are logically independent
+ * properties, so we have separate macros to test them.
+ */
+#define HAS_GUC(dev)		(IS_GEN9(dev) && !IS_KABYLAKE(dev))
+#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev)	(HAS_GUC(dev))
+#define HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev)	(HAS_GUC(dev))
 
 #define HAS_RESOURCE_STREAMER(dev) (IS_HASWELL(dev) || \
 				    INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 4f1dfe6..cdd6397 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ int intel_guc_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	int ret;
 	unsigned long irqflags;
 
-	if (!i915.enable_guc_submission)
+	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
-- 
1.9.1