[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] x86: Silence 32bit compiler warning in intel_graphics_stolen()
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon May 9 13:12:42 UTC 2016
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 04:04:31PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On pe, 2016-05-06 at 13:57 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 05:15:17PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c: In function ‘intel_graphics_stolen’:
> > > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:539:9: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects
> > > argument of type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘phys_addr_t’ [-Wformat=]
> > > "0x%llx-0x%llx\n", base, base + size - 1);
> > > ^
> > > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:539:9: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects
> > > argument of type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘phys_addr_t’ [-Wformat=]
> > This also makes the actual printk output crap. On my non-PAE machine
> > I saw somehting resembling this:
> > Reserving Intel graphics memory at 0x37ffffff3ffffffff-0x200000000
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Fixes: ee0629cfd3c16 (drm/i915: Function per early graphics quirk)
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> > > index d2f75b4..068ab3f 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> > > @@ -535,8 +535,8 @@ intel_graphics_stolen(int num, int slot, int func,
> > > if (!size || !base)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > - printk(KERN_INFO "Reserving Intel graphics stolen memory at "
> > > - "0x%llx-0x%llx\n", base, base + size - 1);
> > > + printk(KERN_INFO "Reserving Intel graphics memory at 0x%llx-0x%llx\n",
> > > + (long long)base, (long long)(base + size - 1));
>
> Any reason not to make this %pa and %zx while at it?
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "Reserving Intel graphics memory at %pa (size 0x%zx)\n", &base, size);
The start-end style matches better with the e820 dump and whatnot.
IIRC that was the reason I made it look like it does.
>
> Regards, Joonas
>
> > >
> > > /* Mark this space as reserved */
> > > e820_add_region(base, size, E820_RESERVED);
> > > --
> > > 2.8.1
> --
> Joonas Lahtinen
> Open Source Technology Center
> Intel Corporation
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list