[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/21] drm/i915: Assert the dbuf is enabled when disabling DC5/6

Imre Deak imre.deak at intel.com
Thu May 19 19:49:23 UTC 2016


On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 16:59 +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> 
> Like with cdclk, the DMC is supposed to manage dbuf enabling/disabling.
> Let's make sure it has correctly restored the dbuf state to enabled
> when we disable the DC states.
> 
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index b70e123f67ca..27cb92c18bb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -806,6 +806,15 @@ static bool gen9_dc_off_power_well_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	return (I915_READ(DC_STATE_EN) & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5_DC6_MASK) == 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void skl_assert_dbuf_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)

I would've used gen9_ prefix. Either way:
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>

> +{
> +	u32 tmp = I915_READ(DBUF_CTL);
> +
> +	WARN((tmp & (DBUF_POWER_STATE | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST)) !=
> +	     (DBUF_POWER_STATE | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST),
> +	     "Unexpected DBuf power power state (0x%08x)\n", tmp);
> +}
> +
>  static void gen9_dc_off_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  					  struct i915_power_well *power_well)
>  {
> @@ -814,6 +823,8 @@ static void gen9_dc_off_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	WARN_ON(dev_priv->cdclk_freq !=
>  		dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev_priv->dev));
>  
> +	skl_assert_dbuf_enabled(dev_priv);
> +
>  	if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
>  		broxton_ddi_phy_verify_state(dev_priv);
>  }


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list