[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] tests/gem_close_race: Tune down for BAT ~1s.
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri May 27 12:31:10 UTC 2016
On 27/05/16 13:16, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:10:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 27/05/16 12:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:50:34PM +0300, Marius Vlad wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad at intel.com>
>>>
>>> Nak. It's a race detector. Please suggest how to increase detection
>>> rates.
>>
>> As a more or less well know TV personality would say - "it's better
>> than nothing"! :))
>>
>> Seriously, under the new rules this is all we can do. Full
>> gem-close-race will (will it?) run in the nightly run so a little
>> bit more pain while bisecting breakages but those are the rules. We
>> can give them a go and see how it works out.
>
> Wrong approach. Right approach would be to add a new test that reliably
> detected a checklist of the most common races in under 1s. Nerfing a
> test to make it useless makes BAT equally useless.
>
> So we are giving up on BAT?
If it is not possible to stuff everything into the allocated budget, and
in cases where it may not be possible to come up with a 1s race
detector, it makes sense to move the test out of BAT and into the
nightly runs.
Agreement was that the time limits are hard limits so thats pretty much
it. We can do this now and hit the targets and them add more tests if
and when someone manages to implement them.
I don't have a problem with that, B in BAT stands for basic anyway.
We just adjust the model that when nightly test run fails someone from
QA gets tasked with bisection etc as a top priority.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list