[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/skl+: calculate ddb minimum allocation (v5)
Mahesh Kumar
mahesh1.kumar at intel.com
Mon May 30 05:05:47 UTC 2016
On Friday 27 May 2016 03:43 AM, Matt Roper wrote:
> From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar at intel.com>
>
> don't always use 8 ddb as minimum, instead calculate using proper
> algorithm.
>
> v2: optimizations as per Matt's comments.
>
> v3 (by Matt):
> - Fix boolean logic for !fb test in skl_ddb_min_alloc()
> - Adjust negative tiling format comparisons in skl_ddb_min_alloc() to
> improve readability.
>
> v4 (by Matt):
> - Rebase onto recent atomic watermark changes
> - Slight tweaks to code flow to make the logic more closely match the
> description in the bspec.
>
> v5 (by Matt):
> - Handle minimum scanline calculation properly for 4 & 8 bpp formats.
> 8bpp isn't actually possible right now, but it's listed in the bspec
> so I've included it here for forward compatibility (similar to how
> we have logic for NV12).
>
> Cc: matthew.d.roper at intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Kumar, Mahesh <mahesh1.kumar at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 3cf36dc..00b50bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3042,6 +3042,67 @@ skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *intel_cstate)
> return total_data_rate;
> }
>
> +static uint16_t
> +skl_ddb_min_alloc(const struct drm_plane_state *pstate,
> + const int y)
> +{
> + struct drm_framebuffer *fb = pstate->fb;
> + struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate = to_intel_plane_state(pstate);
> + uint32_t src_w, src_h;
> + uint32_t min_scanlines = 8;
> + uint8_t plane_bpp;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!fb))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* For packed formats, no y-plane, return 0 */
> + if (y && fb->pixel_format != DRM_FORMAT_NV12)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* For Non Y-tile return 8-blocks */
> + if (fb->modifier[0] != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED &&
> + fb->modifier[0] != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED)
> + return 8;
> +
> + src_w = drm_rect_width(&intel_pstate->src) >> 16;
> + src_h = drm_rect_height(&intel_pstate->src) >> 16;
> +
> + if (intel_rotation_90_or_270(pstate->rotation))
> + swap(src_w, src_h);
> +
> + /* Halve UV plane width and height for NV12 */
> + if (fb->pixel_format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12 && !y) {
> + src_w /= 2;
> + src_h /= 2;
> + }
> +
> + plane_bpp = y ? drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0) :
> + drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 1);
Here in case of y=0 we should call drm_format_plane_cpp with argument 0,
(pixel formats which have number of plane 1)
else above function will return zero as plane BPP.
regards,
-Mahesh
> +
> + if (intel_rotation_90_or_270(pstate->rotation)) {
> + switch (plane_bpp) {
> + case 1:
> + min_scanlines = 32;
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + min_scanlines = 16;
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + min_scanlines = 8;
> + break;
> + case 8:
> + min_scanlines = 4;
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN(1, "Unsupported pixel depth %u for rotation",
> + plane_bpp);
> + min_scanlines = 32;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP((4 * src_w * plane_bpp), 512) * min_scanlines/4 + 3;
> +}
> +
> static int
> skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */)
> @@ -3104,11 +3165,8 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> continue;
> }
>
> - minimum[id] = 8;
> - if (pstate->fb->pixel_format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12)
> - y_minimum[id] = 8;
> - else
> - y_minimum[id] = 0;
> + minimum[id] = skl_ddb_min_alloc(pstate, 0);
> + y_minimum[id] = skl_ddb_min_alloc(pstate, 1);
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < PLANE_CURSOR; i++) {
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list