[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Use intel_fb_gtt_offset() also for gen2/3 primary plane

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Nov 8 13:55:19 UTC 2016


On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:20:05PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:20:57PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > The code to determine the primary plane offset for gen2/3 looks
> > different than the code for gen4+, but in fact it's doing the same
> > thing. Let's make it uniform. Allows us to eliminate the 'obj' from
> > the list of local variables as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 817ed3f320f7..3d519d701e1c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -3017,7 +3017,6 @@ static void i9xx_update_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *primary,
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> >  	struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->base.fb;
> > -	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_obj(fb);
> >  	int plane = intel_crtc->plane;
> >  	u32 linear_offset;
> >  	u32 dspcntr;
> > @@ -3112,8 +3111,11 @@ static void i9xx_update_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *primary,
> >  			   intel_crtc->dspaddr_offset);
> >  		I915_WRITE(DSPTILEOFF(plane), (y << 16) | x);
> >  		I915_WRITE(DSPLINOFF(plane), linear_offset);
> > -	} else
> > -		I915_WRITE(DSPADDR(plane), i915_gem_object_ggtt_offset(obj, NULL) + linear_offset);
> > +	} else {
> > +		I915_WRITE(DSPADDR(plane),
> > +			   intel_fb_gtt_offset(fb, rotation) +
> > +			   intel_crtc->dspaddr_offset);
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

Patches 3-5 pushed to dinq. Thanks for the review.

> 
> Though the reader might notice the same offset being passed to both gen4+
> DSPSURF and gen3- DSPADDR, and might reasonably ask if they should be
> sharing a variable.

Perhaps. I think I'll be merging the pre-ilk and ilk codepaths soon,
so I'll see if I can reorganize some of this offset stuff at the same
time a bit.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list