[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm: move allocation out of drm_get_format_name()

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Eric Engestrom
<eric.engestrom at imgtec.com> wrote:
>> Well, had to drop it again since it didn't compile:
>>
>>
>>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.o
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c: In function ‘drm_atomic_plane_print_state’:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c:920:5: error: too few arguments to function ‘drm_get_format_name’
>>      drm_get_format_name(fb->pixel_format));
>>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> In file included from ./include/drm/drmP.h:71:0,
>>                  from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c:29:
>> ./include/drm/drm_fourcc.h:65:7: note: declared here
>>  char *drm_get_format_name(uint32_t format, struct drm_format_name_buf *buf);
>>        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Can you pls rebase onto drm-misc or linux-next or something?
>
> That was based on airlied/drm-next (last fetched on Sunday I think),
> I can rebase it on drm-misc if it helps, but it seems older than
> drm-next.
> Should I just rebase on top of current head of drm-next?

It needs to be drm-misc (linux-next doesn't have it yet) due to the
new atomic debug work that we just landed. I'm working on drm-tip as a
drm local integration tree to ease pains like these a bit, but that
doesn't really exist yet.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch