[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Always evaluate GEM_BUG_ON expression
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Nov 11 12:09:21 UTC 2016
On 11/11/2016 11:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:40:45PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>> Evaluate GEM_BUG_ON expression similar to actual BUG_ON even if
>> DEBUG_GEM is disabled.
>>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
>> index 51ec793..d141676 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM
>> #define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) BUG_ON(expr)
>> #else
>> -#define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) do { } while (0)
>> +#define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) do { if (expr) {} } while(0)
>> #endif
>
> Mentioned on irc, that I'm not that keen on having the side-effects
> around. Suggestion was while (0) do { if (expr) {} } while (0)
Sounds good to me.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list