[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Split up hangcheck phases

[Mika Kuoppala]

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:45:41PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Series Details ==
>> 
>> Series: series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Split up hangcheck phases
>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/15351/
>> State : success
>> 
>> == Summary ==
>> 
>> Series 15351v1 Series without cover letter
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/15351/revisions/1/mbox/
>> 
>> 
>> fi-bdw-5557u     total:244  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:15 
>> fi-bsw-n3050     total:244  pass:204  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40 
>> fi-bxt-t5700     total:244  pass:216  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28 
>> fi-byt-j1900     total:244  pass:216  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28 
>> fi-byt-n2820     total:244  pass:212  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32 
>> fi-hsw-4770      total:244  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20 
>> fi-hsw-4770r     total:244  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20 
>> fi-ilk-650       total:244  pass:191  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:53 
>> fi-ivb-3520m     total:244  pass:222  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
>> fi-ivb-3770      total:244  pass:222  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
>> fi-kbl-7200u     total:244  pass:222  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
>> fi-skl-6260u     total:244  pass:230  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
>> fi-skl-6700hq    total:244  pass:223  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21 
>> fi-skl-6700k     total:244  pass:222  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21 
>> fi-skl-6770hq    total:244  pass:230  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
>> fi-snb-2520m     total:244  pass:212  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32 
>> fi-snb-2600      total:244  pass:211  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:33 
>
> Worth asking: what's the impact on the hangcheck tests runtime within BAT?
>

Will measure.

I suspect that we will be a tad faster due to brutal
nature of igt hangs being now deterministcally detected in hangcheck
resolution accuracy...

> Presumably still the same timeouts...

and that the simplest engine fastest detection was 4.5secs
on old code. Now it is 4secs.

I just wanted second resolution the defines.

-Mika

> -Chris
>
> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre