[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 16 08:25:15 UTC 2016


On 15/11/2016 17:19, Praveen Paneri wrote:
> Decoupled MMIO is an alternative way to access forcewake domain
> registers, which requires less cycles for a single read/write and
> avoids frequent software forcewake.
> This certainly gives advantage over the forcewake as this new
> mechanism “decouples” CPU cycles and allow them to complete even
> when GT is in a CPD (frequency change) or C6 state.
>
> This can co-exist with forcewake and we will continue to use forcewake
> as appropriate. E.g. 64-bit register writes to avoid writing 2 dwords
> separately and land into funny situations.
>
> v2:
> - Moved platform check out of the function and got rid of duplicate
>  functions to find out decoupled power domain (Chris)
> - Added a check for forcewake already held and skipped decoupled
>  access (Chris)
> - Skipped writing 64 bit registers through decoupled MMIO (Chris)
>
> v3:
> - Improved commit message with more info on decoupled mmio (Tvrtko)
> - Changed decoupled operation to enum and used u32 instead of
>  uint_32 data type for register offset (Tvrtko)
> - Moved HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO to device info (Tvrtko)
> - Added lookup table for converting fw_engine to pd_engine (Tvrtko)
> - Improved __gen9_decoupled_read and __gen9_decoupled_write
>  routines (Tvrtko)
>
> v4:
> - Fixed alignment and variable names (Chris)
> - Write GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1 register in just one go (Zhe Wang)
>
> v5:
> - Changed HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO() argument name to dev_priv (Tvrtko)
> - Sanitize info->had_decoupled_mmio at init (Chris)
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhe Wang <zhe1.wang at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Paneri <praveen.paneri at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Please put "(v4)" when you carry over the r-b and it wasn't explicitly 
said you are OK to just keep it.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |  17 +++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c     |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |   7 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 4e7148a..c1eec04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -549,6 +549,18 @@ enum forcewake_domains {
>  #define FW_REG_READ  (1)
>  #define FW_REG_WRITE (2)
>
> +enum decoupled_power_domain {
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_BLITTER = 0,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_RENDER,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_MEDIA,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL
> +};
> +
> +enum decoupled_ops {
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_WRITE = 0,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_READ
> +};
> +
>  enum forcewake_domains
>  intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			       i915_reg_t reg, unsigned int op);
> @@ -683,7 +695,8 @@ struct intel_csr {
>  	func(cursor_needs_physical); \
>  	func(hws_needs_physical); \
>  	func(overlay_needs_physical); \
> -	func(supports_tv)
> +	func(supports_tv); \
> +	func(has_decoupled_mmio)
>
>  struct sseu_dev_info {
>  	u8 slice_mask;
> @@ -2652,6 +2665,8 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
>  #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
>  #define GEN9_FREQ_SCALER 3
>
> +#define HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_decoupled_mmio)
> +
>  #include "i915_trace.h"
>
>  static inline bool intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 70a99ce..fce8e19 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@
>  	.has_hw_contexts = 1,
>  	.has_logical_ring_contexts = 1,
>  	.has_guc = 1,
> +	.has_decoupled_mmio = 1,
>  	.ddb_size = 512,
>  	GEN_DEFAULT_PIPEOFFSETS,
>  	IVB_CURSOR_OFFSETS,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 3361d7f..c70c07a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -7342,6 +7342,13 @@ enum {
>  #define  SKL_FUSE_PG1_DIST_STATUS              (1<<26)
>  #define  SKL_FUSE_PG2_DIST_STATUS              (1<<25)
>
> +/* Decoupled MMIO register pair for kernel driver */
> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0			_MMIO(0xF00)
> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1			_MMIO(0xF04)
> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO			(1<<31)
> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_SHIFT			28
> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_SHIFT			24
> +
>  /* Per-pipe DDI Function Control */
>  #define _TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_A		0x60400
>  #define _TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_B		0x61400
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index e2b188d..e953303 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -402,6 +402,8 @@ static void intel_uncore_edram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  static void __intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  					  bool restore_forcewake)
>  {
> +	struct intel_device_info *info = mkwrite_device_info(dev_priv);
> +
>  	/* clear out unclaimed reg detection bit */
>  	if (check_for_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv))
>  		DRM_DEBUG("unclaimed mmio detected on uncore init, clearing\n");
> @@ -419,6 +421,10 @@ static void __intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				   GT_FIFO_CTL_RC6_POLICY_STALL);
>  	}
>
> +	/* Enable Decoupled MMIO only on BXT C stepping onwards */
> +	if (!IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, BXT_REVID_C0, REVID_FOREVER))
> +		info->has_decoupled_mmio = false;

Why have you decided to put it in here? It doesn't make much difference 
except conceptually. This runs every time on resume while I thought 
intel_device_info_runtime_init would have been more appropriate.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> +
>  	intel_uncore_forcewake_reset(dev_priv, restore_forcewake);
>  }
>
> @@ -831,6 +837,66 @@ static bool is_gen8_shadowed(u32 offset)
>  	__unclaimed_reg_debug(dev_priv, reg, read, before);
>  }
>
> +static const enum decoupled_power_domain fw2dpd_domain[] = {
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_RENDER,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_BLITTER,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_MEDIA,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Decoupled MMIO access for only 1 DWORD
> + */
> +static void __gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +					 u32 reg,
> +					 enum forcewake_domains fw_domain,
> +					 enum decoupled_ops operation)
> +{
> +	enum decoupled_power_domain dp_domain;
> +	u32 ctrl_reg_data = 0;
> +
> +	dp_domain = fw2dpd_domain[fw_domain - 1];
> +
> +	ctrl_reg_data |= reg;
> +	ctrl_reg_data |= (operation << GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_SHIFT);
> +	ctrl_reg_data |= (dp_domain << GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_SHIFT);
> +	ctrl_reg_data |= GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO;
> +	__raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1, ctrl_reg_data);
> +
> +	if (wait_for_atomic((__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv,
> +			    GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1) &
> +			    GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO) == 0,
> +			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS))
> +		DRM_ERROR("Decoupled MMIO wait timed out\n");
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32
> +__gen9_decoupled_mmio_read32(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +			     u32 reg,
> +			     enum forcewake_domains fw_domain)
> +{
> +	__gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(dev_priv, reg, fw_domain,
> +				     GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_READ);
> +
> +	return __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +__gen9_decoupled_mmio_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +			    u32 reg, u32 data,
> +			    enum forcewake_domains fw_domain)
> +{
> +
> +	__raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0, data);
> +
> +	__gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(dev_priv, reg, fw_domain,
> +				     GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_WRITE);
> +}
> +
> +
>  #define GEN2_READ_HEADER(x) \
>  	u##x val = 0; \
>  	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
> @@ -935,6 +1001,28 @@ static inline void __force_wake_auto(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	GEN6_READ_FOOTER; \
>  }
>
> +#define __gen9_decoupled_read(x) \
> +static u##x \
> +gen9_decoupled_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, \
> +		       i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) { \
> +	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
> +	GEN6_READ_HEADER(x); \
> +	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(offset); \
> +	if (fw_engine & ~dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active) { \
> +		unsigned i; \
> +		u32 *ptr_data = (u32 *) &val; \
> +		for (i = 0; i < x/32; i++, offset += sizeof(u32), ptr_data++) \
> +			*ptr_data = __gen9_decoupled_mmio_read32(dev_priv, \
> +								 offset, \
> +								 fw_engine); \
> +	} else { \
> +		val = __raw_i915_read##x(dev_priv, reg); \
> +	} \
> +	GEN6_READ_FOOTER; \
> +}
> +
> +__gen9_decoupled_read(32)
> +__gen9_decoupled_read(64)
>  __fwtable_read(8)
>  __fwtable_read(16)
>  __fwtable_read(32)
> @@ -1064,6 +1152,25 @@ static inline void __force_wake_auto(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
>  }
>
> +#define __gen9_decoupled_write(x) \
> +static void \
> +gen9_decoupled_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, \
> +			i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, \
> +		bool trace) { \
> +	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
> +	GEN6_WRITE_HEADER; \
> +	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(offset); \
> +	if (fw_engine & ~dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active) \
> +		__gen9_decoupled_mmio_write(dev_priv, \
> +					    offset, \
> +					    val, \
> +					    fw_engine); \
> +	else \
> +		__raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
> +	GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
> +}
> +
> +__gen9_decoupled_write(32)
>  __fwtable_write(8)
>  __fwtable_write(16)
>  __fwtable_write(32)
> @@ -1287,6 +1394,14 @@ void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(__gen9_fw_ranges);
>  		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(fwtable);
>  		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(fwtable);
> +		if (HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO(dev_priv)) {
> +			dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl =
> +						gen9_decoupled_read32;
> +			dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readq =
> +						gen9_decoupled_read64;
> +			dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel =
> +						gen9_decoupled_write32;
> +		}
>  		break;
>  	case 8:
>  		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list