[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v6 07/21] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Nov 17 15:48:56 UTC 2016
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:01:55AM -0500, robert.foss at collabora.com wrote:
> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
>
> Add subtest test_sync_merge that tests merging fences and the validity of the
> resulting merged fence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch>
> ---
> tests/sw_sync.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
> index 9667b93..528be4d 100644
> --- a/tests/sw_sync.c
> +++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,70 @@ static void test_sync_busy(void)
> close(timeline);
> }
>
> +static void test_sync_merge(void)
> +{
> + int in_fence[3];
> + int fence_merge;
> + int timeline;
> + int active, signaled;
> +
> + timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
> + in_fence[0] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 1);
> + in_fence[1] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 2);
> + in_fence[2] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 3);
> +
> + fence_merge = sync_merge(in_fence[0], in_fence[1]);
> + fence_merge = sync_merge(in_fence[2], fence_merge);
Can I suggest the pattern:
fence_merge = -1;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(in_fence); i++) {
in_fence[i] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, i + 1);
fence_merge = sync_merge(fence_merge, in_fence[i]);
active = sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[i],
SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
igt_assert_f(active == 1, "in_fence[%d] has too many active fences\n", i);
igt_assert(!sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[i],
SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED));
igt_assert(!sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED));
}
> + /* confirm that fence_merge is not signaled until the max of fence 0,1,2 */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(in_fence); i++) {
sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
signaled = sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[i],
SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
igt_assert_f(signaled == 1, "in_fence[%d] did not signal\n", i);
signaled = sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
active = sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
if (i + 1 == ARRAY_SIZE(in_fence)) { /* all signaled -> merge complete */
igt_assert_f(active == 0 && signaled == 1,
"fence_merge did not signal\n");
} else {
igt_assert_f(active == 1 && signaled == 0,
"fence_merge signaled too early\n");
}
close(in_fence[1]);
}
> + close(fence_merge);
> + close(timeline);
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
> @@ -131,5 +195,8 @@ igt_main
>
> igt_subtest("sync_busy")
> test_sync_busy();
> +
> + igt_subtest("sync_merge")
> + test_sync_merge();
> }
>
> --
> 2.10.2
>
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list