[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v6 07/21] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Nov 17 15:48:56 UTC 2016


On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:01:55AM -0500, robert.foss at collabora.com wrote:
> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
> 
> Add subtest test_sync_merge that tests merging fences and the validity of the
> resulting merged fence.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch>
> ---
>  tests/sw_sync.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
> index 9667b93..528be4d 100644
> --- a/tests/sw_sync.c
> +++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,70 @@ static void test_sync_busy(void)
>  	close(timeline);
>  }
>  
> +static void test_sync_merge(void)
> +{
> +	int in_fence[3];
> +	int fence_merge;
> +	int timeline;
> +	int active, signaled;
> +
> +	timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
> +	in_fence[0] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 1);
> +	in_fence[1] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 2);
> +	in_fence[2] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 3);
> +
> +	fence_merge = sync_merge(in_fence[0], in_fence[1]);
> +	fence_merge = sync_merge(in_fence[2], fence_merge);

Can I suggest the pattern:

fence_merge = -1;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(in_fence); i++) {
	in_fence[i] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, i + 1);
	fence_merge = sync_merge(fence_merge, in_fence[i]);

	active = sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[i],
					 SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
	igt_assert_f(active == 1, "in_fence[%d] has too many active fences\n", i);

	igt_assert(!sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[i],
					    SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED));
	igt_assert(!sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
					    SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED));
}

> +	/* confirm that fence_merge is not signaled until the max of fence 0,1,2 */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(in_fence); i++) {
	sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);

	signaled = sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[i],
					   SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
	igt_assert_f(signaled == 1, "in_fence[%d] did not signal\n", i);

	signaled = sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
					   SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
	active = sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
					 SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
	if (i + 1 == ARRAY_SIZE(in_fence)) { /* all signaled -> merge complete */
		igt_assert_f(active == 0 && signaled == 1,
			     "fence_merge did not signal\n");
	} else {
		igt_assert_f(active == 1 && signaled == 0,
			     "fence_merge signaled too early\n");
	}

	close(in_fence[1]);
}

> +	close(fence_merge);
> +	close(timeline);
> +}
> +
>  igt_main
>  {
>  	igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
> @@ -131,5 +195,8 @@ igt_main
>  
>  	igt_subtest("sync_busy")
>  		test_sync_busy();
> +
> +	igt_subtest("sync_merge")
> +		test_sync_merge();
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.10.2
> 

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list