[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dp: Fail DP MST config when there are not enough vcpi slots
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Fri Nov 18 08:43:56 UTC 2016
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:03:46PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> drm_dp_find_vcpi_slots() returns an error when there is not enough
> available bandwidth on a link to support a mode. This error should make
> compute_config() to fail. Not returning false could end up in a modeset
> which will not work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> index e21cf08..4280a83 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ static bool intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>
> pipe_config->pbn = mst_pbn;
> slots = drm_dp_find_vcpi_slots(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, mst_pbn);
> + if (slots < 0) {
> + DRM_ERROR("not enough available time slots for pbn=%d", mst_pbn);
No DRM_ERROR for cases that are expected to fail, i.e. DRM_DEBUG_KMS is
the right level.
And I don't think this works correctly either. Assume you do an atomic
modeset where you enable 2 mst sinks at the same time, and the following
happens:
- mst connector 1 can be allocated, and passes
intel_dp_mst_compute_config.
- mst connector 2 can be allocated, but not together with connector 1.
But drm_dp_find_vcpi_slots only checks what's available, it doesn't do a
temporary reservation.
And we can just reserve the slot in drm_dp_find_vcpi_slots, because then
in the above case (when connector 2 doesn't have enough slots anymore)
we'd leak the vcpi allocation for connector 1.
Even worse, when we do a TEST_ONLY atomic commit (i.e. only run
atomic_check/compute_config code, but not commit anything) this can even
happen for a successful commit.
Long story short: To fix this properly we need to rewrite the dp helpers
to be compliant with atomic design. I think for that we roughly need:
- Exract vcpi allocations into a free-standing state structure. I'd call
it drm_dp_mst_state or similar. Provide duplicate(get_state)/release
functions like we already have for plane, connector and crtc states in
the core, and e.g. dpll configuration in i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c. Ander
Conselvan can help you with this. I'm also planning to write better
documentation for how to do this exactly (since you also need a ww_mutex
to protect this state), and I'll prioritize that work.
- Wire up that dp mst state at the right places globally (we need one slot
per drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr, i.e. per port), and duplicate that state in
intel_dp_mst_compute_config. We can't wire this up anywhere in the core
since the dp mst library is a helper library, so all the integration
points need to be done explicitly in drivers.
- Do the same for nouveau - nouveau is now also atomic, and it also is
atomic with mst support.
- While doing all that make sure that the existing (non-atomic-compliant)
functions in the dp mst helpers keep working, we need those for amggpu.
- Create a new drm_dp_state_allocate_vcpi_slots, which only touches the
new drm_dp_mst_state structure and allocats the vcpi slots there. Also
add some function to find the allocation for each sink again (we need
that in the modeset commit functions).
- Rework our compute_config and modeset code to use this new function, and
not the old legacy find/allocate functions.
To make this happen we need buy-in from Ben Skeggs (nouveau maintainer)
and preferrably also from the AMD display team (since they support mst
already, and also plan to eventually support atomic).
Fixing this correctly is unfortunately a _lot_ more work than your simple
patch here :(
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list