[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 11/11] drm/i915: Add a kerneldoc summary for i915_perf.c

Tue Nov 22 13:43:00 UTC 2016

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:49:57PM +0000, Robert Bragg wrote:
> In particular this tries to capture for posterity some of the early
> challenges we had with using the core perf infrastructure in case we
> ever want to revisit adapting perf for device metrics.
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert at sixbynine.org>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Missing the include stanza in Documentation/gpu/i915.rst, which means this
won't show up in the docs build. Also function/struct docs are not
included either it seems.

Please check out Documentation/kernel-documentation.rst and build it all
with

$ make DOCBOOKS="" htmldocs

Again fixup patch is fine.
-Daniel

>  1 file changed, 163 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index 1a87fe9..9551282 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,169 @@
>   *   Robert Bragg <robert at sixbynine.org>
>   */
>  
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: i915 Perf, streaming API for GPU metrics
> + *
> + * Gen graphics supports a large number of performance counters that can help
> + * driver and application developers understand and optimize their use of the
> + * GPU.
> + *
> + * This i915 perf interface enables userspace to configure and open a file
> + * descriptor representing a stream of GPU metrics which can then be read() as
> + * a stream of sample records.
> + *
> + * The interface is particularly suited to exposing buffered metrics that are
> + * captured by DMA from the GPU, unsynchronized with and unrelated to the CPU.
> + *
> + * Streams representing a single context are accessible to applications with a
> + * corresponding drm file descriptor, such that OpenGL can use the interface
> + * without special privileges. Access to system-wide metrics requires root
> + * privileges by default, unless changed via the dev.i915.perf_event_paranoid
> + * sysctl option.
> + *
> + *
> + * The interface was initially inspired by the core Perf infrastructure but
> + * some notable differences are:
> + *
> + * i915 perf file descriptors represent a "stream" instead of an "event"; where
> + * a perf event primarily corresponds to a single 64bit value, while a stream
> + * might sample sets of tightly-coupled counters, depending on the
> + * configuration.  For example the Gen OA unit isn't designed to support
> + * orthogonal configurations of individual counters; it's configured for a set
> + * of related counters. Samples for an i915 perf stream capturing OA metrics
> + * will include a set of counter values packed in a compact HW specific format.
> + * The OA unit supports a number of different packing formats which can be
> + * selected by the user opening the stream. Perf has support for grouping
> + * events, but each event in the group is configured, validated and
> + * authenticated individually with separate system calls.
> + *
> + * i915 perf stream configurations are provided as an array of u64 (key,value)
> + * pairs, instead of a fixed struct with multiple miscellaneous config members,
> + * interleaved with event-type specific members.
> + *
> + * i915 perf doesn't support exposing metrics via an mmap'd circular buffer.
> + * The supported metrics are being written to memory by the GPU unsynchronized
> + * with the CPU, using HW specific packing formats for counter sets. Sometimes
> + * the constraints on HW configuration require reports to be filtered before it
> + * would be acceptable to expose them to unprivileged applications - to hide
> + * the metrics of other processes/contexts. For these use cases a read() based
> + * interface is a good fit, and provides an opportunity to filter data as it
> + * gets copied from the GPU mapped buffers to userspace buffers.
> + *
> + *
> + * Some notes regarding Linux Perf:
> + * --------------------------------
> + *
> + * The first prototype of this driver was based on the core perf
> + * infrastructure, and while we did make that mostly work, with some changes to
> + * perf, we found we were breaking or working around too many assumptions baked
> + * into perf's currently cpu centric design.
> + *
> + * In the end we didn't see a clear benefit to making perf's implementation and
> + * interface more complex by changing design assumptions while we knew we still
> + * wouldn't be able to use any existing perf based userspace tools.
> + *
> + * Also considering the Gen specific nature of the Observability hardware and
> + * how userspace will sometimes need to combine i915 perf OA metrics with
> + * side-band OA data captured via MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT commands; we're
> + * expecting the interface to be used by a platform specific userspace such as
> + * OpenGL or tools. This is to say; we aren't inherently missing out on having
> + * a standard vendor/architecture agnostic interface by not using perf.
> + *
> + *
> + * For posterity, in case we might re-visit trying to adapt core perf to be
> + * better suited to exposing i915 metrics these were the main pain points we
> + * hit:
> + *
> + * - The perf based OA PMU driver broke some significant design assumptions:
> + *
> + *   Existing perf pmus are used for profiling work on a cpu and we were
> + *   introducing the idea of _IS_DEVICE pmus with different security
> + *   implications, the need to fake cpu-related data (such as user/kernel
> + *   registers) to fit with perf's current design, and adding _DEVICE records
> + *   as a way to forward device-specific status records.
> + *
> + *   The OA unit writes reports of counters into a circular buffer, without
> + *   involvement from the CPU, making our PMU driver the first of a kind.
> + *
> + *   Given the way we were periodically forward data from the GPU-mapped, OA
> + *   buffer to perf's buffer, those bursts of sample writes looked to perf like
> + *   we were sampling too fast and so we had to subvert its throttling checks.
> + *
> + *   Perf supports groups of counters and allows those to be read via
> + *   transactions internally but transactions currently seem designed to be
> + *   explicitly initiated from the cpu (say in response to a userspace read())
> + *   and while we could pull a report out of the OA buffer we can't
> + *   trigger a report from the cpu on demand.
> + *
> + *   Related to being report based; the OA counters are configured in HW as a
> + *   set while perf generally expects counter configurations to be orthogonal.
> + *   Although counters can be associated with a group leader as they are
> + *   opened, there's no clear precedent for being able to provide group-wide
> + *   configuration attributes (for example we want to let userspace choose the
> + *   OA unit report format used to capture all counters in a set, or specify a
> + *   GPU context to filter metrics on). We avoided using perf's grouping
> + *   feature and forwarded OA reports to userspace via perf's 'raw' sample
> + *   field. This suited our userspace well considering how coupled the counters
> + *   are when dealing with normalizing. It would be inconvenient to split
> + *   counters up into separate events, only to require userspace to recombine
> + *   them. For Mesa it's also convenient to be forwarded raw, periodic reports
> + *   for combining with the side-band raw reports it captures using
> + *   MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT commands.
> + *
> + *   _ As a side note on perf's grouping feature; there was also some concern
> + *     that using PERF_FORMAT_GROUP as a way to pack together counter values
> + *     would quite drastically inflate our sample sizes, which would likely
> + *     lower the effective sampling resolutions we could use when the available
> + *     memory bandwidth is limited.
> + *
> + *     With the OA unit's report formats, counters are packed together as 32
> + *     or 40bit values, with the largest report size being 256 bytes.
> + *
> + *     PERF_FORMAT_GROUP values are 64bit, but there doesn't appear to be a
> + *     documented ordering to the values, implying PERF_FORMAT_ID must also be
> + *     used to add a 64bit ID before each value; giving 16 bytes per counter.
> + *
> + *   Related to counter orthogonality; we can't time share the OA unit, while
> + *   event scheduling is a central design idea within perf for allowing
> + *   userspace to open + enable more events than can be configured in HW at any
> + *   one time.  The OA unit is not designed to allow re-configuration while in
> + *   use. We can't reconfigure the OA unit without losing internal OA unit
> + *   state which we can't access explicitly to save and restore. Reconfiguring
> + *   the OA unit is also relatively slow, involving ~100 register writes. From
> + *   userspace Mesa also depends on a stable OA configuration when emitting
> + *   MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT commands and importantly the OA unit can't be
> + *   disabled while there are outstanding MI_RPC commands lest we hang the
> + *   command streamer.
> + *
> + *   The contents of sample records aren't extensible by device drivers (i.e.
> + *   the sample_type bits). As an example; Sourab Gupta had been looking to
> + *   attach GPU timestamps to our OA samples. We were shoehorning OA reports
> + *   into sample records by using the 'raw' field, but it's tricky to pack more
> + *   than one thing into this field because events/core.c currently only lets a
> + *   pmu give a single raw data pointer plus len which will be copied into the
> + *   ring buffer. To include more than the OA report we'd have to copy the
> + *   report into an intermediate larger buffer. I'd been considering allowing a
> + *   vector of data+len values to be specified for copying the raw data, but
> + *   it felt like a kludge to being using the raw field for this purpose.
> + *
> + * - It felt like our perf based PMU was making some technical compromises
> + *   just for the sake of using perf:
> + *
> + *   perf_event_open() requires events to either relate to a pid or a specific
> + *   cpu core, while our device pmu related to neither.  Events opened with a
> + *   pid will be automatically enabled/disabled according to the scheduling of
> + *   that process - so not appropriate for us. When an event is related to a
> + *   cpu id, perf ensures pmu methods will be invoked via an inter process
> + *   interrupt on that core. To avoid invasive changes our userspace opened OA
> + *   perf events for a specific cpu. This was workable but it meant the
> + *   majority of the OA driver ran in atomic context, including all OA report
> + *   forwarding, which wasn't really necessary in our case and seems to make
> + *   our locking requirements somewhat complex as we handled the interaction
> + *   with the rest of the i915 driver.
> + */
> +
>  #include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
>  
> -- 
> 2.10.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch