[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Make GPU pages movable

Matthew Auld matthew.william.auld at gmail.com
Tue Nov 22 16:02:49 UTC 2016


On 9 November 2016 at 18:36, Hugh Dickins <hughd at google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> Hi all -mm folks!
>>
>> Any feedback on these two? It's kinda an intermediate step towards a
>> full-blown gemfs, and I think useful for that. Or do we need to go
>> directly to our own backing storage thing? Aside from ack/nack from -mm I
>> think this is ready for merging.
>
> I'm currently considering them at last: will report back later.
>
> Full-blown gemfs does not come in here, of course; but let me
> fire a warning shot since you mention it: if it's going to use swap,
> then we shall probably have to nak it in favour of continuing to use
> infrastructure from mm/shmem.c.  I very much understand why you would
> love to avoid that dependence, but I doubt it can be safely bypassed.
Could you please elaborate on what specifically you don't like about
gemfs implementing swap, just to make sure I'm following?

Thanks,
Matt


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list