[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Fix off-by-one error on debug
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Nov 24 13:26:46 UTC 2016
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 03:22:10PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> We now clearly see that in order to get next seqno we need to add one.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 3b4db55..f75d10a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static int i915_gem_pageflip_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> seq_printf(m, "Flip queued on %s at seqno %x, next seqno %x [current breadcrumb %x], completed? %d\n",
> engine->name,
> work->flip_queued_req->global_seqno,
> - atomic_read(&dev_priv->gt.global_timeline.seqno),
> + 1 + atomic_read(&dev_priv->gt.global_timeline.seqno),
I was thinking that req->engine->last_submitted_seqno would be more
useful to report (in terms of deciding what is causing the stall).
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list