[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/skl: Increase PCODE CDCLK change notify timeout
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Fri Nov 25 10:57:01 UTC 2016
commit 848496e5902833600f7992f4faa82dc1546051ba
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed Jul 13 16:32:03 2016 +0300
drm/i915: Wait up to 3ms for the pcu to ack the cdclk change request on SKL
increased the timeout to match the spec, but we still see a timeout on
at least one SKL. A CDCLK change request following the failed one will
succeed nevertheless, so let's try to increase the timeout to 10ms.
v2:
- Use 1ms poll period instead of 10us. (Chris)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97929
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 5d11002..f07b611 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6261,7 +6261,7 @@ static bool skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
static bool skl_cdclk_wait_for_pcu_ready(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- return _wait_for(skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(dev_priv), 3000, 10) == 0;
+ return wait_for(skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(dev_priv), 10) == 0;
}
static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int cdclk, int vco)
--
2.5.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list