[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/gtt: Free unused lower-level page tables
Joonas Lahtinen
joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com
Wed Oct 5 06:40:48 UTC 2016
On ti, 2016-10-04 at 15:54 +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> Since "Dynamic page table allocations" were introduced, our page tables
> can grow (being dynamically allocated) with address space range usage.
> Unfortunately, their lifetime is bound to vm. This is not a huge problem
> when we're not using softpin - drm_mm is creating an upper bound on used
> range by causing addresses for our VMAs to eventually be reused.
>
> With softpin, long lived contexts can drain the system out of memory
> even with a single "small" object. For example:
>
> bo = bo_alloc(size);
> while(true)
> offset += size;
> exec(bo, offset);
>
> Will cause us to create new allocations until all memory in the system
> is used for tracking GPU pages (even though almost all PTEs in this vm
> are pointing to scratch).
>
> Let's free unused page tables in clear_range to prevent this - if no
> entries are used, we can safely free it and return this information to
> the caller (so that higher-level entry is pointing to scratch).
>
Sounds like this could and should have a I-G-T testcase, right?
> @@ -706,7 +710,7 @@ static int gen8_48b_mm_switch(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt,
> return gen8_write_pdp(req, 0, px_dma(&ppgtt->pml4));
> }
>
> -static void gen8_ppgtt_clear_pt(struct i915_address_space *vm,
Add comment for non-obvious bool return value.
> +static bool gen8_ppgtt_clear_pt(struct i915_address_space *vm,
> struct i915_page_table *pt,
> uint64_t start,
> uint64_t length,
> @@ -724,50 +728,102 @@ static void gen8_ppgtt_clear_pt(struct i915_address_space *vm,
> I915_CACHE_LLC, use_scratch);
>
> if (WARN_ON(!px_page(pt)))
> - return;
> + return false;
>
> bitmap_clear(pt->used_ptes, pte_start, num_entries);
>
> + if (bitmap_empty(pt->used_ptes, GEN8_PTES)) {
> + free_pt(vm->dev, pt);
Maybe the caller should do the free_pt()? If kept here, should at least
be clearly documented.
Other than those, looks like good improvements to me.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list