[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move long hpd handling into the hotplug work
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Oct 5 09:49:22 UTC 2016
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:39:16PM +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 10:55 +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > We can't rely on connector->status in the detect() hook if the long hpd
> > was already handled by the dig_port_work as that won't update
> > connector->status. Thus we have to defer the long hpd handling entirely
> > until the hotplug work runs to avoid the double long hpd handling
> > the "detect_done" flag is trying to prevent.
>
> This is better indeed. But perhaps add a note here about the next patch, since
> this one doesn't actually change the use of connector->status usage in detect().
>
> For both patches:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2 at gmail.com>
Thanks. I added a small note to 1/2 and pushed both patches to dinq.
>
> >
> > Cc: Damien Cassou <damien at cassou.me>
> > Cc: freedesktop.org at gp.mailgun.org
> > Cc: Arno <blouin.arno at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava at intel.com>
> > Cc: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani at intel.com>
> > Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2 at gmail.com>
> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> > Tested-by: Arno <blouin.arno at gmail.com>
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83348
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > ---
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 9448d898d80b..96caa469e3a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -4827,36 +4827,34 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port
> > *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
> > port_name(intel_dig_port->port),
> > long_hpd ? "long" : "short");
> >
> > + if (long_hpd) {
> > + intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > + }
> > +
> > power_domain = intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
> > intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, power_domain);
> >
> > - if (long_hpd) {
> > - intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
> > - if (intel_dp->is_mst)
> > - ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> > - goto put_power;
> > -
> > - } else {
> > - if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> > - if (intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp) == -EINVAL) {
> > - /*
> > - * If we were in MST mode, and device is not
> > - * there, get out of MST mode
> > - */
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have
> > disappeared %d vs %d\n",
> > - intel_dp->is_mst, intel_dp-
> > >mst_mgr.mst_state);
> > - intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> > - drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp-
> > >mst_mgr,
> > - intel_dp-
> > >is_mst);
> > - goto put_power;
> > - }
> > + if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> > + if (intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp) == -EINVAL) {
> > + /*
> > + * If we were in MST mode, and device is not
> > + * there, get out of MST mode
> > + */
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have disappeared %d vs
> > %d\n",
> > + intel_dp->is_mst, intel_dp-
> > >mst_mgr.mst_state);
> > + intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> > + drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
> > + intel_dp->is_mst);
> > + intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> > + goto put_power;
> > }
> > + }
> >
> > - if (!intel_dp->is_mst) {
> > - if (!intel_dp_short_pulse(intel_dp)) {
> > - intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp-
> > >attached_connector);
> > - goto put_power;
> > - }
> > + if (!intel_dp->is_mst) {
> > + if (!intel_dp_short_pulse(intel_dp)) {
> > + intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> > + goto put_power;
> > }
> > }
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list