[Intel-gfx] [Regression report] Weekly regression report WW40

[Argotti, Yann]

> 
> On 06/10/16 13:26, Conselvan De Oliveira, Ander wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 13:11 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, "Argotti, Yann" <yann.argotti at intel.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
> >>>>> <jairo.daniel.miramontes.caton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This week regressions
> >>>>> In the past we used "regression", "bisect_pending", and "bisected"
> >>>>> in the bugzilla "Keywords" field. Can we start using those again,
> please?
> >>>> I think this is a very good idea Jani. So we can start to scrub
> >>>> current regression (and then igt linked one) and update
> accordingly.
> >>>> Yann
> >>> Two additional thoughts are:
> >>> - add "regression_pending" (vs "regression") as well as keyword to
> >>> indicate where bug reporter has doubt on the fact it is or not a
> >>> regression.
> >> I think it should be enough, at least for a start (or should I say
> >> re-start), to freely use "regression" when things worked in the past
> >> but do not work anymore. We can then drop the keyword if it's not
> >> proven to be a regression.
> >>
> >> No strong feelings on "regression_pending", though. But I don't think
> >> you can add keywords at will, I think the field only accepts a
> >> predefined set of keywords. So you'd need to talk to Ander or Martin
> >> (Cc'd) to get the new one to bugzilla.
> >
> > I don't have admin access in bugzilla, so I would just forward such
> > requests to Martin.
> 
> Just tell me what you need when you all agree on the name :)
Thanks Martin.

Ok, so let use what it is already set, "re-starting" with "regression" key word but ensuring that use of this keyword is done simultaneously with good & bad commit id to brace that statement.
Yann