[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix silent conflict from backmerge of drm-next into dinf

[Jani Nikula]

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Merging from drm-next pulled back in a few lines of dead code due to the
> code movement around i915_gem_reset(), fix that up.

Actually the problem was introduced in

commit ca09fb9f60b5f3ab2d57e761aaeea89a5147d784
Merge: 9f4ef05bcdcf 08895a8b6b06
Author: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Sep 28 12:08:49 2016 +1000

    Merge tag 'v4.8-rc8' into drm-next

and it's present in drm-next, and the conflict wasn't silent.

If this is the right fix (Daniel ack?) I'll queue it with other drm-next
fixes that I have.


BR,
Jani.


>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 981a106901ae..1418c1c522cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2616,8 +2616,6 @@ static void i915_gem_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  	list_for_each_entry_continue(request, &engine->request_list, link)
>  		if (request->ctx == incomplete_ctx)
>  			reset_request(request);
> -
> -	engine->i915->gt.active_engines &= ~intel_engine_flag(engine);
>  }
>  
>  void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -2628,7 +2626,6 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv)
>  		i915_gem_reset_engine(engine);
> -	mod_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq, &dev_priv->gt.idle_work, 0);
>  
>  	i915_gem_restore_fences(&dev_priv->drm);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center