[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Remove kms_psr_sink_crc at psr_basic from BAT

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com> wrote:
> The test is producing a lot of CI noise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> ---
>
> Will be pushed shortly. Visible in CI results tomorrow-ish.
>
>
> tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index ae94381..e2fc9ac 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-c-frame-sequence
>  igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a
>  igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b
>  igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c
> -igt at kms_psr_sink_crc@psr_basic

This landed without an ack from Rodrigo and Jim as the engineers.
That's not good at all, because the point of this list was that we
have more visibility in what CI does. Adding Rodrigo and Jim as fyi.

More generally I think we need to have full-on review requirement for
igt patches too, to avoid this kind of fun. Sneaking stuff in like
this is a no-go.
-Daniel


>  igt at kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc
>  igt at kms_sink_crc_basic
>  igt at pm_backlight@basic-brightness
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch