[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Allocate intel_engine_cs structure only for the enabled engines (rev3)

[Chris Wilson]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:47:24PM +0000, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > >
> > > Series: drm/i915: Allocate intel_engine_cs structure only for the enabled
> > engines (rev3)
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/13435/
> > > State : warning
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > Series 13435v3 drm/i915: Allocate intel_engine_cs structure only for
> > > the enabled engines
> > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/13435/revisions/3/mbo
> > > x/
> > >
> > > Test vgem_basic:
> > >         Subgroup unload:
> > >                 pass       -> SKIP       (fi-skl-6260u)
> > >                 pass       -> SKIP       (fi-skl-6700hq)
> > >                 skip       -> PASS       (fi-skl-6700k)
> > >
> > Checked with Chris about the above failure.
> > He said that the above unload failure for vgem module can't be attributed to
> > the patch, most likely a CI framework issue.
> Yes, this test is still behaving badly especially with SKL systems but also with bdw and kbl.

Are the test run in the order defined by fast-feedback.testlist ?
I intended the vgem unload test to be run as the first vgem testcase to
minimise the chance of a stray module leak. Can we define the order
within CI? Can we put comments into fast-feedback.testlist ?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre