[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

[Jeff McGee]

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:43:02AM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> From: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine at intel.com>
> 
> This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC.
> As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated
> status to show when the HuC is loaded and ready for use. You cannot use
> the loaded status as with the GuC as the HuC is verified after it is
> loaded and is not usable until it is verified.
> 
> v2: removed the forewakes as the registers are already force-woken.
>      (T.Ursulin)
> v4: rebased.
> v5: rebased.
> 
> Tested-by: Xiang Haihao <haihao.xiang at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c         |  4 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h        |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h             |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index ff1c18d..0d7b290 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>  #include "i915_trace.h"
>  #include "i915_vgpu.h"
>  #include "intel_drv.h"
> +#include "intel_huc.h"
>  #include "intel_guc.h"
>  
>  static struct drm_driver driver;
> @@ -343,6 +344,9 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  	case I915_PARAM_HAS_GUC:
>  		value = intel_is_guc_valid(dev_priv);
>  		break;
> +	case I915_PARAM_HAS_HUC:
> +		value = intel_is_huc_valid(dev_priv);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		DRM_DEBUG("Unknown parameter %d\n", param->param);
>  		return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h
> index 946caa7..5eac625 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h
> @@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ extern void intel_huc_init(struct drm_device *dev);
>  extern int intel_huc_load(struct drm_device *dev);
>  extern void intel_huc_auth(struct drm_device *dev);
>  extern void intel_huc_fini(struct drm_device *dev);
> -
> +extern int intel_is_huc_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c
> index 87a6948..d574183 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c
> @@ -273,3 +273,17 @@ void intel_huc_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>  	huc_fw->fetch_status = UC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_is_huc_valid() - Check to see if the HuC is fully loaded.
> + * @dev_priv:	drm device to check.
> + *
> + * This function will return true if the guc has been loaded and
> + * has valid firmware. The simplest way of doing this is to check
> + * if the HuC has been validated, if so it must have been loaded.
> + */
> +int intel_is_huc_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
I'm still unclear on the 'intel' vs. 'i915' prefix usage. But it seems
that intel prefixed functions accept drm_device instead of drm_i915_private.

Also, need to see the userspace usage of this new GETPARAM.

> +{
> +	return ((I915_READ(HUC_STATUS2) & HUC_FW_VERIFIED) != 0);
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> index 629fb5e..d236520 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait {
>  #define I915_PARAM_MIN_EU_IN_POOL	 39
>  #define I915_PARAM_MMAP_GTT_VERSION	 40
>  #define I915_PARAM_HAS_GUC		 41
> +#define I915_PARAM_HAS_HUC		 42
>  
>  typedef struct drm_i915_getparam {
>  	__s32 param;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx