[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Suppress underruns during DP link retraining
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Oct 14 17:27:49 UTC 2016
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 08:02:54PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> DP link retraining causes (spurious?) underruns. We can't really avoid
> them, except perhaps by doing a full modeset (which has its own underrun
> suppression anyway). So let's just hide them.
>
> MST still has its own logic for retrainin, but a bigger hpd handling
> cleanup/unification is needed there anyway, so let's leave that be for now.
>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98251
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index bc03f61d94f1..780691a34133 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3988,6 +3988,31 @@ go_again:
> }
>
> static void
> +intel_dp_retrain_link(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> +
> + /* Suppress underruns caused by re-training */
> + intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, false);
> + if (crtc->config->has_pch_encoder)
> + intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv,
> + intel_crtc_pch_transcoder(crtc), false);
> +
> + intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
> + intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
> +
> + /* Keep underrun reporting disabled until things are stable */
> + intel_wait_for_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->pipe);
I panicked over the irqreturn for hpd_pulse. That's a scary way of
saying the return type is boolean.
> + intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, true);
> + if (crtc->config->has_pch_encoder)
> + intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv,
> + intel_crtc_pch_transcoder(crtc), true);
These are becoming quite popular. Is has_pch_encoder generic enough for
all crtc?
intel_crtc_suppress_underruns(struct intel_crtc *crtc, bool state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
if (!state)
intel_wait_for_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->pipe);
intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, state);
if (crtc->config->has_pch_encoder)
intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv,
intel_crtc_pch_transcoder(crtc),
state);
}
If this was igt, we would be writing all kinds of silly
#define intel_crtc_suppress_underruns(crtc, state) \
for (state = true; __intel_crtc_suppress_underruns(crtc, state); state = false)
intel_crtc_suppress_underruns(crtc, state) {
intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
}
Other than bikeshedding to see if we can trim down the profileration,
this looks inline with the suppression everywhere else, so
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Main concern was over the vblank wait making short/long pulse handling
slower, but the code looks like it will survive - and the only
noticeable artifacts would be if link training failed anyway with the
small delay before recovery.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list