[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/vgem_basic: Retry the initial module unload in unload test

Petri Latvala petri.latvala at intel.com
Tue Oct 18 12:41:54 UTC 2016



On 10/18/2016 02:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:25:21PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
>> If executed too soon after prime_vgem tests, the vgem unload test
>> fails due to its execbuffers still being handled in the kernel. Retry
>> the unload three times with sleeps before reporting a skip.
> What happened to igt ensuring that the driver was idle before closing a
> test? I guess that is complicated by the use of multiple drivers in
> vgem.
>
> diff --git a/lib/drmtest.c b/lib/drmtest.c
> index 40bbff6..5d3aaa8 100644
> --- a/lib/drmtest.c
> +++ b/lib/drmtest.c
> @@ -344,14 +344,18 @@ int drm_open_driver(int chipset)
>          fd = __drm_open_driver(chipset);
>          igt_skip_on_f(fd<0, "No known gpu found\n");
>   
> -       if (__sync_fetch_and_add(&open_count, 1))
> -               return fd;
> -
> +       /* For i915, at least, we ensure that the driver is idle before
> +        * starting a test and we install an exit handler to wait until
> +        * idle before quitting.
> +        */
>          if (is_i915_device(fd)) {
> -               gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> -               igt_install_exit_handler(quiescent_gpu_at_exit);
> +               if (__sync_fetch_and_add(&open_count, 1) == 0) {
> +                       gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> +
> +                       at_exit_drm_fd = __drm_open_driver(chipset);
> +                       igt_install_exit_handler(quiescent_gpu_at_exit);
> +               }
>          }
> -       at_exit_drm_fd = __drm_open_driver(chipset);
>   
>          return fd;
>   }
>

Well I'll be damned, that's an obvious bugfix, regardless of its effects 
on vgem unload. Please push that with a descriptive commit message and 
Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>.

How should vgem work be flushed properly? With this i915 flushing is 
guaranteed even if vgem is opened first, then i915, but such flushing 
won't be done if only vgem is opened (I see only vgem_slow doing that)...

Jari will soon reply about vgem unload with this change applied.


-- 
Petri Latvala



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list