[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/kms_flip: Print more information to debug for flip timing checks
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Mon Oct 24 08:33:53 UTC 2016
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:35:04PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We have a cantiga that doesn't pass
> igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank, and so knowing why is off the
> upmost priority! Before the assertions print the values we are about to
> test in greater detail.
>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98352
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Random drive-by, but I wonder whether some helpers to print timings here
might be useful. Stuff like how many % of the vrefresh an error is, and
how that compares to the line-time (since on some boxes that's our limit
for timestamp accuracy). Either way more debug info is great (and this is
a bit a mess either way ...).
-Daniel
> ---
> tests/kms_flip.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
> index 7646aaf..b30e07c 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
> @@ -686,24 +686,23 @@ static void check_state(const struct test_output *o, const struct event_state *e
> }
>
> if ((o->flags & TEST_CHECK_TS) && (!analog_tv_connector(o))) {
> - double usec_interflip, usec_diff;
> + double elapsed, expected;
>
> timersub(&es->current_ts, &es->last_ts, &diff);
> - usec_diff = diff.tv_sec * USEC_PER_SEC + diff.tv_usec;
> + elapsed = 1e6*diff.tv_sec + diff.tv_usec;
> + expected = (es->current_seq - es->last_seq) * frame_time(o);
>
> - usec_interflip = (es->current_seq - es->last_seq) * frame_time(o);
> - igt_assert_f(fabs((usec_diff - usec_interflip) /
> - usec_interflip) <= 0.005,
> - "inconsistent %s ts/seq: last %ld.%06ld/%u, current %ld.%06ld/%u\n",
> - es->name, es->last_ts.tv_sec, es->last_ts.tv_usec, es->last_seq,
> - es->current_ts.tv_sec, es->current_ts.tv_usec, es->current_seq);
> + igt_debug("%s ts/seq: last %ld.%06ld/%u, current %ld.%06ld/%u: elapsed=%.1fus expected=%.1fus +- %.1fus, error %.1f%%\n",
> + es->name, es->last_ts.tv_sec, es->last_ts.tv_usec, es->last_seq,
> + es->current_ts.tv_sec, es->current_ts.tv_usec, es->current_seq,
> + elapsed, expected, expected * 0.005,
> + fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) * 100);
>
> - usec_interflip = o->seq_step * frame_time(o);
> - igt_assert_f(fabs((usec_diff - usec_interflip) /
> - usec_interflip) <= 0.005,
> - "inter-%s ts jitter: %ld.%06ld, expected %.6f\n",
> - es->name, diff.tv_sec, diff.tv_usec,
> - usec_interflip / USEC_PER_SEC);
> + igt_assert_f(fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005,
> + "inconsistent %s ts/seq: last %ld.%06ld/%u, current %ld.%06ld/%u: elapsed=%.1fus expected=%.1fus\n",
> + es->name, es->last_ts.tv_sec, es->last_ts.tv_usec, es->last_seq,
> + es->current_ts.tv_sec, es->current_ts.tv_usec, es->current_seq,
> + elapsed, expected);
>
> igt_assert_f(es->current_seq == es->last_seq + o->seq_step,
> "unexpected %s seq %u, expected %u\n",
> @@ -1192,14 +1191,17 @@ static void check_final_state(const struct test_output *o,
> /* Verify we drop no frames, but only if it's not a TV encoder, since
> * those use some funny fake timings behind userspace's back. */
> if (o->flags & TEST_CHECK_TS && !analog_tv_connector(o)) {
> - double expected;
> - int count = es->count;
> -
> - count *= o->seq_step;
> - expected = (double)elapsed / frame_time(o);
> - igt_assert_f(fabs((double)count - expected)/expected <= 0.01,
> - "dropped frames, expected %f, counted %d, encoder type %d\n",
> - expected, count, o->kencoder[0]->encoder_type);
> + int count = es->count * o->seq_step;
> + unsigned int min = frame_time(o) * (count - 1);
> + unsigned int max = frame_time(o) * (count + 1);
> +
> + igt_debug("expected %d, counted %d, encoder type %d\n",
> + (int)(elapsed / frame_time(o)), count,
> + o->kencoder[0]->encoder_type);
> + igt_assert_f(elapsed >= min && elapsed <= max,
> + "dropped frames, expected %d, counted %d, encoder type %d\n",
> + (int)(elapsed / frame_time(o)), count,
> + o->kencoder[0]->encoder_type);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list