[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix comment referencing imaginary functions

[Matthew Auld]

> These are untraced mmio-accessors that are only valid to be used inside
> critical sections inside IRQ handlers where forcewake is explicitly
> controlled.
>
> Think twice, and think again, before using these.
>
> Those possibly should be used between:
>
> spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> intel_uncore_forcewake_get();
>
> and
>
> intel_uncore_forcewake_put();
> spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
>
>
> Note: some registers may not need forcewake held, so
> intel_uncore_forcewake_{get,put} can be omitted.
>
> Code may be serialised by different lock, so immediate
> spin_{lock,unlock}_irq() may not be necessary.
Maybe roll that up into a new patch? Assuming Chris is happy...