[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] intel-ci: CI is missing any wait tests in BAT

[Petri Latvala]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:00:43PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Add the two basic gem_wait tests to the fast list, together they take a
> total of 1s (when correctly functioning).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index f59ec98..853b911 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ igt at gem_sync@basic-store-each
>  igt at gem_tiled_blits@basic
>  igt at gem_tiled_fence_blits@basic
>  igt at gem_tiled_pread_basic
> +igt at gem_wait@basic-busy-all
> +igt at gem_wait@basic-wait-all
>  igt at gem_workarounds@basic-read
>  igt at gvt_basic@invalid-placeholder-test
>  igt at kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-bad-modifier
> -- 
> 2.9.3


In the future we will test new tests in the CI system. Unfortunately
the technology isn't there yet (tm) so this had to be tested
manually. Sorry for the delay.

For the record, the testing requirements for incoming new tests is
converging to:

- Tests must be stable. 1000 repeated runs with the new tests alone
  must give the same results. 10 repeated runs of modified BAT set
  must give the same results (excluding known issues in other tests).
- Tests must be fast. Full modified BAT run must not exceed the time
  budget.
- Tests must pass on current kernels, on some platform.

This will be documented when we can get CI do the testing for us on
multiple platforms and properly know what kind of requirements can
actually be tested.

For these tests, manual testing was done on IVB, HSW, and BYT. Stable,
fast and passing on all.


Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>

Please push.



--
Petri Latvala