[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/21] drm/i915: Reorder i915_add_request to separate the phases better

[Chris Wilson]

Let's avoid mixing sealing the hardware commands for the request and
adding the request to the software tracking.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index c60a7b774cc6..34571e1eb328 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -492,6 +492,8 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches)
 	u32 reserved_tail;
 	int ret;
 
+	trace_i915_gem_request_add(request);
+
 	/*
 	 * To ensure that this call will not fail, space for its emissions
 	 * should already have been reserved in the ring buffer. Let the ring
@@ -515,20 +517,6 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches)
 		WARN(ret, "engine->emit_flush() failed: %d!\n", ret);
 	}
 
-	trace_i915_gem_request_add(request);
-
-	/* Seal the request and mark it as pending execution. Note that
-	 * we may inspect this state, without holding any locks, during
-	 * hangcheck. Hence we apply the barrier to ensure that we do not
-	 * see a more recent value in the hws than we are tracking.
-	 */
-	request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies;
-	request->previous_seqno = engine->last_submitted_seqno;
-	engine->last_submitted_seqno = request->fence.seqno;
-	i915_gem_active_set(&engine->last_request, request);
-	list_add_tail(&request->link, &engine->request_list);
-	list_add_tail(&request->ring_link, &ring->request_list);
-
 	/* Record the position of the start of the breadcrumb so that
 	 * should we detect the updated seqno part-way through the
 	 * GPU processing the request, we never over-estimate the
@@ -549,6 +537,18 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches)
 		  "for adding the request (%d bytes)\n",
 		  reserved_tail, ret);
 
+	/* Seal the request and mark it as pending execution. Note that
+	 * we may inspect this state, without holding any locks, during
+	 * hangcheck. Hence we apply the barrier to ensure that we do not
+	 * see a more recent value in the hws than we are tracking.
+	 */
+	request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies;
+	request->previous_seqno = engine->last_submitted_seqno;
+	engine->last_submitted_seqno = request->fence.seqno;
+	i915_gem_active_set(&engine->last_request, request);
+	list_add_tail(&request->link, &engine->request_list);
+	list_add_tail(&request->ring_link, &ring->request_list);
+
 	i915_gem_mark_busy(engine);
 
 	local_bh_disable();
-- 
2.9.3